View Full Version : Signed vs. Unsigned
igotgrapes
03-27-2008, 05:01 PM
So what's so wrong with using a signed client? I auto using smart, and that's the only time I use signed, but I want to know why so many people don't want to use signed. I just want to know all of the pros/cons of either one and why so many people look down on signed autoing.
mixster
03-27-2008, 05:10 PM
Signed makes a random.dat file that keeps track of all users that login from the same IP, so if one account gets banned, the other accounts that logged in from the same IP will be flagged, so will be more likely banned than normally and will encounter more randoms, thus more likely to be stopped. As long as you use good scripts/only one user, you should be fine using signed, but if you have an army or are testing out a new script, it's better to use unsigned so your other accounts don't get flagged if the script fails/isn't too good and you get banned.
igotgrapes
03-27-2008, 05:46 PM
Alright, cuz I'm just going to auto to the first ban on my new main. I just want him to get 75s atleast in all combat stats, I'm running it on HY caver. I have an old main, who is really useless to me because his name is retarded and his 87 fishing means nothing wit the new wealth transfer thing. So he's the only other account that can be flagged, and a ban on him will mean nothing to me. So basically since I don't have an army and my main doesn't matter to me I'm good to auto on signed clients using SMART?
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.1 Copyright © 2024 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.