FindNormalRandoms; vs. R_FindRandoms;

[Smarter Child]

I'm rather curious which Random solvers are working better at the moment?

[Rich]

IIRC, R_FindRandoms will never fail to detect a random, whereas FindNormalRandoms sometimes will. But I think the actual solving is better using the colour function.

[Smarter Child]

IIRC, R_FindRandoms will never fail to detect a random, whereas FindNormalRandoms sometimes will. But I think the actual solving is better using the colour function.

Which would you recommend, because I can't really tell the difference as I haven't observed the random solving on either functions.

[Yago]

Which would you recommend, because I can't really tell the difference as I haven't observed the random solving on either functions.

As soon as Ref2 comes out use the Reflection solvers all the way.

[NCDS]

In my experience color solvers work better (plus they're fun to work on). I've always used them except for ~3 weeks when MSI first started using color or Reflection solvers.

[Smarter Child]

In my experience color solvers work better (plus they're fun to work on). I've always used them except for ~3 weeks when MSI first started using color or Reflection solvers.

Good to know, I'll implement the color solver it into my script(s).

[blackfire553]

i use R_FindRandoms, in my limited experience it has been successful more than FindNormalRandoms

[Smarter Child]

i use R_FindRandoms, in my limited experience it has been successful more than FindNormalRandoms

I've actually noticed that the randoms color fails to solve, reflection solves, and vice versa. If only we could have an optional Color + Reflection include..separately

[mastaraymond]

Pretty sure I redesigned FindNormalRandoms to call R_FindRandoms if the reflection include is loaded..

[Smarter Child]

Pretty sure I redesigned FindNormalRandoms to call R_FindRandoms if the reflection include is loaded..

Oh, didn't know that. That's great though, I guess I'll just run FindNormalRandoms; since my script has Reflection included. :)