yes... the one thing i dislike about bible bashers(not a flame, more of an endearment) is the way that if there is something in the bible that happens in real life, no matter how abstract it is from the actual bible reference, they will immediately jump on it and say "hey look, heres proof"
with a 2000+ page book, written >2000 years ago(old testament as well) there are bound to be some consistencies if you look hard enough.
OH???? america doesnt deal with WMDs????
so they have the worlds largest stockpile of WMD's for decoration?
they spend more then any other country in the world on funding to research new ways of making/producing(NOT defending against) WMD's?
america doesnt need to have the stance of "pro-WMD", because of the well known fact that they will use them without hesitation if they need to. if anyone takes a step back and looks at the situation objectively, you will see that america is exactly the type of country that uses WMD's
i dont think there is a single islamic country with a WMD of its own...
http://www.fas.org/irp/threat/wmd_state.htm
nope, i was wrong...
ok, there are less then 4 countries with WMD's
compared to easily more then 15 christian countries.
einstien said that only because at the time, the church funded most scientific research. so what he said was actually correct. without the churches funding, science was lame(i.e. could not move foward)
where did the big bang come from?
i would direct you to google, but i think i better explain this one myself.
before the big bang, time did not exist. therefore, there is no "before" the big bang, in much the same way that you christians believe that before the earth, only god existed, and there is no "before" god existed.
where did bacteria come from?
again, you could have quite easily googled this.
there are 2 theories as to the original developement of life, as i have a biology exam in three hours, both are still pretty fresh in my mind.
the first theory is chemical evolution.
this states that 3.5-4BYA, the gasses in the atmosphere, combined with the huge lightning storms at the time, produced amino acids(google "urey and miller experiment" for evidence), amino acids eventually formed nuclei(a singular nucleus) and after that a cell membrane
hence prokaryotic cells were formed.
interesting things to google on this topic:
urey and miller experiment
oparen and haldane(oparen might not be the right spelling)
archaea
second theory:
as there was no ozone layer at the time of formation of the first cells(3.5 BYA) there were alot of meteors crashing into the earth(for evidence, look at the moon, you notice alot of meteor craters? notice the moon has no ozone? 1 + 1 = 2)
in the 1970's several tests were done on meteors that had recently hit earth, it was found that the meteors actually contained biologically viable(i.e. could eventually form into cells under the right conditions) amino acids.