The Philosophy of an SRL Membership
Hello again SRL community,
It's time again for another long post. Now don't go "OH NO, WALL OF TEXT", but READ. It's (I hope) a valuable insight.
I was thinking again, and reading around, and came to wondering exactly WHAT being an SRL member meant. Does it mean that now one knows how to script, and has thus gained access to the "premium" scripts? If so, I do believe this must change, as this also encourages leechership, though maybe a higher rank of it. If one can gain access for one script, nevertheless with revisions, if one had a strong background in scripting, this would mean almost nothing. Nothing meaning, it doesn't show a will to learn, to enjoy, be a part of the community. Thus, after writing that one script, one can stay in, unless one is disruptive and retarded. No further effort needed.
On the other hand, I have seen members of this community who are dedicated people, yet just because they have not written that one special script, they are not allowed access. What do you value more in a member? Is it the dedication, or the skill that might be? How many "SRL Members" visit a non-script forum every other day, much less have a post a day? Wouldn't you rather have the 500+ post members, who have shown that they will come again and again to a community to which they are not even allowed full access? Ones that give the occasional valuable insight, provide a personality?
Thus, I propose that members should not be considered only for a script, but even members without scripting skill, who show dedication and provide something for the community should be considered as members. I will give a few names here, for the sake of example. hy71194 and Sp0rk-eh are both returning contributing members of the community, yet are denied access solely based on below-average scripts. Yet both have had a major impact on the community, having more than half the posts of some of the admins.
So what do you think, SRL? What should be done?
Feedback appreciated.