Printable View
As some may or may not have noticed, ScarScape is (I think, at least for me) broken.
I was wondering.. Who would pay for ScarScape if it became pay only?
I would, because it would greatly improve the accuracy of my DTM's (>.<)
Post here your opinions, and vote in the poll.
~ProphesyOfWolf
What's wrong with your accuracy of DTM's?Quote:
Originally Posted by ProphesyOfWolf
Is it because of the mini map rotating?
Just add some Area size and tolerance.
~Eerik~
Who needs SS when you've got SMART?
I would not. It has been free, and it should stay free. BTW, it is a better challenge with out it. (Using the acctual RS client)
My computer can't run SMART, so yeah.Quote:
Originally Posted by NaumanAkhlaQ
About the DTM's. I said DTM's, not DDTM's. For some reason, the colors are terribly inaccurate with the RuneScape window. THAT'S why I want SS.
You can add Areashape to normal DDTM's too?Quote:
Originally Posted by ProphesyOfWolf
For the colors, just add tolerance.
And could you tell us the problem you are getting with smart, maybe we can help? :)
~Eerik~
Same as everyone - Computer sucks, gets stuck at 80%.
Got it to work once, but then it phailed.
Besides, I think Sythe deserves some payment for the great job he did on SS.
If this works it will really make your day! This problem used to happen to me until I changed a something.Quote:
Originally Posted by ProphesyOfWolf
SCAR Code:Smartsetup(prefix,true,true,false);//this is normally how people setup their SMART(which doesn't work for you)This is what I heard from someone, "if you change the signed boolean to false it will work!".SCAR Code://This is the layout of SmartSetup
SmartSetup(prefix, safe, signed, superDetail);
So now try this
Tell me if it works for you aswell.SCAR Code:Smartsetup(prefix,true,false,false);//all i did was change it to false for signed.
Yeh why would anyone pay for ScarScape if we have smart, unless you are lazy on getting RadialWalk and that stuff getting to work, I would be lazier to pay :p
If it wasn't ******* detectable, wasn't useless due to reflection, and wasn't ******* easy to make, and if I actually wanted to pay for RS besides for p2p, maybe.
I would absolutely not pay.
However, I do think that the community should collect a donation if we wanted to support it. But it shouldn't be a Pay-To-Get deal..
I wouldn't pay for it at all, prehaps if it was a "week free" thing, then if I made any money from botting using it, I would pay a small amount of the money I made, I'm not going to invest in it though.
lol ive never used scarscape in my life, and never will its for noobs and stay for noob scripters.
So, JuKKa is a noob?
Yes :)
lol... jp but its like dan always say's...
sooooooo thats what im saying.Quote:
Reflection Sucks. Don't use it unless you're dumb. - Dan's The Man
Reflection has nothing to do with ScarScape.
Plus, there is no reason to not use Reflection.
Unless it wouldn't have been created.
its our opinion...
it did ask if we like to pay for scarscape... so i said my opinion so dont hate it..
and reflection is too easyyy.
But still. Why did you say something [which was totally off-topic] about Reflection if we're discussing the probable future payment options of ScarScape.
And, if Reflection's too easy, then why was it developed by SRL Devs?
It was not, a few SRL members and like one or two Devs.
-.-Quote:
Originally Posted by noidea
Here you make it sound like all of them made it .Quote:
Originally Posted by TheVoiceInYourHead
Did the thing I posted earlier work for you? Cause if it did we could end all of the bickering very easily.
Not at home, so yeh. And believe me, making the client unsigned doesn't work for me. I've tried (I lost like 5 hours of sleep over it the other day >.>).
You guys really think that Sythe should just put all this work into something for us, and that he deserves no payment at all? He's right.. Freeloading to the max O.O
I did not intend to turn this into a flaming thread. I was simply asking for a yes or no answer, and maybe some explaining why or why not. Not some huge argument over Reflection. I don't want to hear another thing about it. I'm sure there are reflection flaming threads elsewhere (sorry to those SRL members this is directed towards, but this isn't the right place).
~ProphesyOfWolf
Too bad, it worked for me and a couple of other people, maybe just give it another quick try, wouldn't hurt. Well good luck!Quote:
Originally Posted by ProphesyOfWolf
O also so I am not spamming random smart stuff on this thread, I don't think that I would pay for ScarScape because I don't auto much anymore, I just script and the scripts im working on don't need SS.
I woulsn't use scarscape, I script with smart included, if I couldn't do something without using SS it'd just make me try harder to get better till I got it, I don't think there's much of a point to SS, just use either R.S. regular client or smart. Plus I think I remember hearing a while ago SS is detectable not sure if it was/still is detectable.