I really hope he will give the source to somebody, or fix it by himself.
Printable View
I really hope he will give the source to somebody, or fix it by himself.
Well there are so many gifted scripters here i am sure they could!
[offtopic] hey DJCheat havent seen u around srl in a while [/offtopic]
My guess is that BenLand Will eventually fix SMART, i think he fees unappreciated, then when we need it again, we whine and complain to him. I think its more of a lesson to be thankful for whatcha got :p
SCAR Code:34.function RSReady: Boolean;
35.begin
36 .Result := (LoggedIn) or (GetColor(520, 146) = 4038981);
37.end;
Failed when compiling
Line 36: [Error] (36:12): Unknown identifier 'LoggedIn' in script C:\Program Files\SCAR 3.15\includes\SRL\SRL\Core\Login.scar
What am i doing wrong the one zeph posted come up wif that error.
all works fine, but nextplayer doesnt work when it goes into the graphic options it doesnt click out of it and tries to click login button when graphics options are open
Yeah the skip advert and choosing the graphics when he's logged in both don't work :S
SRL doesn't skip the advert for you so you'll have to do it yourself if it appears. :) Mind telling me whats wrong with SetGraphics?
SetGfx when logged in 2 bugs...
1: Sometimes it will open it and just trying to keep opening it....
2: doesnt close properly missclick's
When NextPlayer happens ( this may be just me) , it goes to type in my username and deubugs it , but it doesnt type then goes to type pass but it doesnt type) so im not sure if its me or not.
I'll have a look at SetGraphics, I know the problem with misclicking is caused by the CloseWindow in the Pub SRL being outdated. The first might be cause the screen got updated since I last had a look at it. Not sure about the problem with the username and pass though, it seems for some reason the text isn't being typed. This is probably the same reason for the problem with closing the graphics screen (login) which presses Esc to exit.Quote:
Originally Posted by NiCbaZ
Yes its very wired.... it only does it on NextPlayer and not the first login, but NextPlayer uses Login so im confused, ive tryed placing in more waits, clicking on the box twice ect.. i cannot run multiplayer scripts atm .. aww well...
Just switch the closeWindow in setgraphics with my mousebox I posted on the first page. It works :).
I also noticed that it doesn't recognize when Chat interfaces are open, nor when a ms interface is open. :(
Whatever decompiler gave you that blasphemy deserves total inhalation, thats horrible code. Anyway, posting that line as the "line to fix" just goes to show that even though you can decompile an ancient version of it, you still have no clue what to do.Quote:
Originally Posted by Widget
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hugolord
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hugolord
FYI I've already fixed it. I really don't appreciate being insulted by you. I could care less about attention from srl, you think you're a lot more special than you are if you think I want you to beg for it, and I never said ANYTHING about wanting you to make your own SMART, so putting that in quotes is slander. If you weren't completely retarded and didn't get all worked up over smart not working for a few days, you might have realize that I haven't been here to do anything about it, and I have better things to do than cater to a community of leachers such as yourself.Quote:
Originally Posted by Hugolord
Would it kill you to show some respect? I seriously doubt anyone here could even figure out the process to build SMART from source, much less maintain it, so releasing the source would only cater to your leaching nature.
Thanks for updating :)Quote:
Originally Posted by BenLand100
oh yeah? Well if you are so "busy" you should just post the source and let us TRY to figure out how you do it.Quote:
Originally Posted by BenLand100
Secondly, I don't give a fuck about SMART to be honest, if it's there then good I can use it.If it's not there I'll just use VMs which work just as well.
The thing I don't like about your SMART is that no one knows how it was made exactly, no one else can make it but YOU and even though this community is all about open source and LEARNING you give us neither.
So thanks for updating it but I would prefer to have the source-code of the BROKEN ANCIENT one anyway.
Ben, we can wait a few days. If it is going to be released - show a bit of respect to Ben. If it isn't, still show some respect.
He's got a point.Quote:
Originally Posted by BenLand100
If you don't "give a fuck" then go stick your head back up your ass where it belongs and leave me alone. Continuing to post and begging for the source just proves that you care, so get your head on straight or stop whining about everything being sideways. I have absolutely no use for the moral supremacy you claim to have. "The thing I don't like about your SMART is that no one knows how it was made exactly" That is possibly the most hypocritical and retarded thing you have ever said. Do you know how anything on your computer is made or much less how it works? Didn't think so, go away please.Quote:
Originally Posted by Hugolord
Now where did I beg you for SMART's source?Quote:
Originally Posted by BenLand100
Anyway, what I meant here "The thing I don't like about your SMART is that no one knows how it was made exactly" is that no one knows what you did, sure you used C(++), java and delphi or w.e like it says on the wiki but nobody knows how to make SMART because you won't post the source out anywhere.
Why not post the source? (I'm not telling you to post it) What are you hiding?
and if the answer is "No one would understand it" or " You would just ask more questions about it after" then it's bs sir.
I know you aren't going to post the source anytime soon, I just feel like sharing my views on your "SMART".
(maybe when runescape dies some day you will release it but I doubt it) ;)
BUT
Ok, almighty one. I take back everything I said on this thread.You are a great guy and I'm sure your intentions are good.
I know what you are trying to do, but it won't work. Nobody will invest the time to re-code an alternative SMART, and if they do it will be a cobbled/hacked together mess which is only JUST functional. The best thing you could do would be to fix it, and release it, then say "you lot fix it if it breaks, bye!".Quote:
Originally Posted by BenLand100
To put it in another perspective, if you don't update it, won't it have been a giant waste of time?
I'm so fucking sick of this retarded begging and fighting and so on!!
OMG!! You fixed it Ben!! You are the man. Everyone that says they don't need SMART, can just fuck the Hell off!!
Sorry for saying this, but I had to. It was a burdon. I just needed to release it from my soul.
well its updated but sorry for the noob question but how do I update it on my own pc? btw I think your doing a great job rep++ :)Quote:
Originally Posted by BenLand100
It doesn't log me in to my chosen world. I chose world 14. It uses the auto world select feature. Please fix this!
So we just change the two files to those, and after saving it, it should work? Sorry, I'm new to all this stuff.
Nice man :P very helpful now i can get 99 fletching lol
You are impossible. You don't know anymore about how colors appear on your screen than you do about SMART, but you don't complain about that. Quit being greedy. It is extremely insulting that you are attacking me for absolutely no reason. I am in no way obligated to release the source to SMART, just as Microsoft and Freddy aren't required to release the source to Windows or Scar. So, if you really have nothing better to do than be an annoyance to someone that is doing the whole community a favor, then please, continue to post and pm me. And if you don't agree with SMART, don't use it. Its pathetic that you feel obligated to ruin everything.Quote:
Originally Posted by Hugolord
I think it is absolutely hilarious that you are so paranoid to think I'm hiding something in a program that hundreds of people have used without incident. If I'm going to invest countless hours of my time into making a program that no one else has been able to make, I'm not going to tell you how I did it, simply because it was MY effort that was put forth. not yours. Do something on your own for a change and quit relying on the rest of the world to wipe your ass. If you want to know how SMART works, figure it out the same way I did, don't be a leach.
Do you know c++ or java? can you write in asm? do you have any idea how to use dynamic link libraries? do you know jni like the back of your hand? Have you gone through the entire java rendering api (including the undocumented parts) as well as the event api (undocumented as well)? Do you understand the java.io.net package? Do you know how to load classes and override classes from the jvm? Do you even have any clue how the JVM works? Do you know how the RS client works? If you answer yes to any of those i'm surprised. If all of them, I'll give you the entire SMART source. Otherwise, go somewhere else. You are the most greedy, malevolent, and sadistic person I have seen recently. Lose the drama, life isn't as interesting as you are trying to make it.
Edit: I just checked all of your recent posts, nothing but you talking, no useful or helpful information, you just want to get your say in. I have news for you, buddy, this is an internet community, meaning if you have time to just post whatever comes to mind and spam up the place, your priorities might be a little off-kilter.
Quote:
If you answer yes to any of those i'm surprised. If all of them, I'll give you the entire SMART source. Otherwise, go somewhere else. You are the most greedy, malevolent, and sadistic person I have seen recently. Lose the drama, life isn't as interesting as you are trying to make it.
too much to read, but i caught the funnny parts ;)
Ben, forget him. I looked at you replying to this thread, looked at his posts on first page, and thought "oh god, here is a guy that's going to jeopardize this wonderful thing for us all". He doesn't speak on behalf of the rest of us, and as long as I have been here, you have been, probably at least the most experienced scripter I have personally talked to. I love SMART, and I hope that you can find time soon to fix whatever is wrong because of the current update.
Greatest respect,
Pwnaz0r
EDIT: and the point below, I agree with that
The reason that people (at least me) want to see the source is to learn how that stuff works. What would be the point in looking through the source if you already know how to write it?Quote:
Originally Posted by BenLand100
That's the point? The only reason you would want to look at SMART is to write your own. If your interest is learning, you'd do better just learning how than you would looking at a highly specialized implementation.Quote:
Originally Posted by bullzeye95
Yea I think at least 99% of scripters here learned by reading tuts before learning from really complicated scripts.
Just to bring up a point, let's say he did write his own. So? It's not like it would matter. The Rest of the SRL community would not say "Oh, I think I will abandon SMART and go to *Bullzeye's versions name here*". I doubt he would release it even if he did make one, and personally, I don't think he would put in all that hard work for something that has already been done...very well...Quote:
Originally Posted by BenLand100
Not everyone around here is that paranoid, some people actually just read the code and be like "cuwl".Quote:
Originally Posted by pwnaz0r
pwnaz0r, it's not about writing your own SMART, it's learning how it was written.Quote:
Originally Posted by pwnaz0r
Ben I think you are not "grasping" the reason I would like the source code written.Hell, I would probably not understand it but that is why you would not be releasing it only to me but to this community as a whole, I am 100% sure that if you released it to SRL-forums at least ONE person would understand it who might then, just might, explain it to the rest of us.Also, you keep calling me a "leach" well to my understanding, and the reason why I even brought this up, is because I feel that I am being one when I use your SMART.The whole reason why I even got into the whole cheating thing was to LEARN, not bot or be famous by creating my own "SMART" or get my own geepee.Lastly, you were the one sending me threatening pms, not me.@Boreas, needless to say that Ben would not write a tutorial, showing us the source would be the easiest thing for Ben and it does not require any work from him to do so.
And, I'd rather you didn't mock me for not knowing Java/C++ etc, we all started out somewhere Ben, even you.
Go ahead and close this thread if you want Ben.
Must you ALWAYS ****ING FLAME!? Seriously, all I have seen you do recently is flame about KYAB and SMART, seriously. It was a gift from benland, and a beautiful tool. If you don't like it, then why go against the supreme agreement of all of us?Quote:
Originally Posted by Hugolord
DONT WASTE YOUR LIFE!
God damn.
P.S. Benland, I thank you. I also would love to see the source, not any time soon, but once I can begin to understand more advanced programing languages. It is an awesome client and I would love to see its internal workings. But for now, thank you for updating. :)
Sorry I should have made analogy clear.Quote:
Originally Posted by Hugolord
Trying to learn from SMART source without knowing those parts Ben listed is like trying to learn from just looking at the most advanced script without knowing any scripting techniques.
Learning what DDTMs, TPAs, etc are from tutorials first (not from a tutorial called 'how to make script XYZ') is like learning about all the things that Ben listed, from whatever places he learned them (not from a tutorial written by Ben called 'how to make smart').
In both cases, if you know the parts first, looking at the source can help you learn how to use them. Without that base of knowledge though, it's not a way to learn.
So, you basically just said you are arguing for no reason. The source will do you no good, but you want it anyway. That makes perfect sense. If you want to start somewhere, looking at SMART's source code is not the place to start. You can't use the argument that you want to learn if you don't even know the languages it was written in, sorry. That would be like trying to learn Chinese by picking up a non-translated Chinese book and guessing until you got it right, but you have no way of knowing if its right. All you want is the source for some greedy reason you've cooked up in your head, and its not my life's goal to satisfy your greed.Quote:
Originally Posted by Hugolord
Edit: Would you carry around a book written in Chinese just to look like you know Chinese? There's a deeper meaning in there I'm sure.
I think its time for a group hug
+1...Quote:
Originally Posted by bobng
Please stop hating eatchother! :(
*Hugs*
I think the graphics options check should be a tad bit longer.
If crapex can see what we do before we log in, and everytime we log in, we "flicker" the graphics options, that'll show them we are getting into something.
I recommend a longer wait time, like 2 secs plus a random half second.
dude chill out , dont post anymore in this thread.Quote:
Originally Posted by Hugolord
its like your arguing with Bill Gates or 1 of his devs. Its Ben choise to release or not, he wants to keep it private . And not give it out. goodness.