ChooseOptionMulti + WizzyPlugin

Yes... The function ReturnPoints was changed.

Then maybe revert back to the previous one, or at least differentiate between what was changed to pin point error and come up with a better solution? :)



~NS

Here is the old plugin if any one wants.

nice post :) only one thing, its a dll...! a .dbr or .pas would've been better/easier IMO



~NS

Here. The dll was just for people that need to use. Here is the other :)

I have an idea to fix it. Give me a few.

Double posting, but does the newest one work?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Nava2

Double posting, but does the newest one work?

---

No, same error. :( Happens in ChooseOption for me.

What was there change? I'd like to see please :)



~NS

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Nadeem

Fine nielsie :P

Here:

pascal Code:

function ReturnPointsNotInTPA(const TotalTPA: TPointArray; Box: TBox): TPointArray;
var
  I, II, R, L, W, H: Integer;
  B: array of array of Boolean;
begin
  W := iAbs(Box.x2 - Box.x1);
  H := iAbs(Box.y2 - Box.y1);
  if (W = 0) or (H = 0) then Exit;
  SetLength(B, W + 1, H + 1);
  SetLength(Result, (W + 1) * (H + 1));
  L := Length(TotalTPA) - 1;

  for I := 0 to L do
    if (TotalTPA[I].x >= Box.x1) and (TotalTPA[I].x <= Box.x2) and
       (TotalTPA[I].y >= Box.y1) and (TotalTPA[I].y <= Box.y2) then
      B[TotalTPA[I].x - Box.x1][TotalTPA[I].y - Box.y1] := True;

  for I := 0 to W do
    for II := 0 to H do
      if not B[I][II] then
      begin
        Result[R].x := I + Box.x1;
        Result[R].y := II + Box.y1;
        R := R + 1;
      end;
  SetLength(B, 0, 0);
  SetLength(Result, R);
end;

~NS

---

I honestly don't see the use for all those failsafes... If you just make sure you pass a correct box everything is well... I've already submitted a patch to nava which should fix the issue.

All this checking is just too much overhead IMO. If I start passing random params to Functions in SCAR it will most likely crash too. You can't add failsafes for everything... :)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Wizzup?

I honestly don't see the use for all those failsafes... If you just make sure you pass a correct box everything is well... I've already submitted a patch to nava which should fix the issue.

All this checking is just too much overhead IMO. If I start passing random params to Functions in SCAR it will most likely crash too. You can't add failsafes for everything... :)

---

lolz kk! :)



~NS

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Nadeem

lolz kk! :)



~NS

---

Well... I don't really mind either way though... If yours works better, it can just be put in as well... It would be considerably slower, so you might add it with a different name, eg: ReturnPointsNotInTPASafe... :)

As you wish bro :) It's your function.



~NS

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Wizzup?

Well... I don't really mind either way though... If yours works better, it can just be put in as well... It would be considerably slower, so you might add it with a different name, eg: ReturnPointsNotInTPASafe... :)

---

Can I have this patch?

Or is it the same one.. because that didn't work.. o.O

Is it fixed. I don't quite understand.

In most cases 'No news is a good news!' but ATM I'm a bit confused. It seemed a few days ago it's getting fixed but after that no feedback at all!? So, Is it or isn't it fixed?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by bugger0001

In most cases 'No news is a good news!' but ATM I'm a bit confused. It seemed a few days ago it's getting fixed but after that no feedback at all!? So, Is it or isn't it fixed?

---

I don't think it is fixed ( Note i'm not toally sure ) But if you use OpenDev version just replace that plugn with Offcicial Rev #33 version Plugin :)

I hope this helped even a little bit someone :)

~Home

Well I've tried that, but doing so makes me get Runtime Errors after solving randoms. Then the problem occurs in the text.scar line 451 where's

SCAR Code:

Result := FindTextTPAinTPA(yy,TextTPA,SearchTPA,Matches);

Don't know if this ones also in Wizzy or not...

fixed in openDev, be sure to move the pluggins.

~RM

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Rasta Magician

fixed in openDev, be sure to move the pluggins.

~RM

---

I think you could even add a check for that... Take a md5 sum of each dll, and see if it matches the current one. ;)

I just got the error xD Didn't know it was fixed already :O
Anyway tysm! Just got it at a 7 hr proggy >.>