Printable View
marpis: We could make the world arrays build itself with a world walker-bot *cough*checkmyscript*cough* who walks to places that hasn't yet been "discovered" in the worldtile-array and then the project would be build using a script instead, making the project a lot easier and smaller
when recording the script the walker should walk so that every tile in the f2p world got picked. Your script would epicly fail that. :rolleyes: In fact it's faster to just run it f2p than to write a script for it, even with reflection.Quote:
Originally Posted by Zyt3x
silentwolf, thanks for posting the source. Appreciated. :)
What do you mean? I have run around the f2p area without failing once. Even in falador where there is a lot of fences/buildings and whatnotQuote:
Originally Posted by marpis
Well you'd have to walk around the whole f2p area with 1 run, without stopping. When your script runs around the whole f2p world so that it has seen every tile on the whole world on mainscreen, without pauses, I salute thee.Quote:
Originally Posted by Zyt3x
Nonono, you don't get it. use the already made array to find out where you are (or the big map) and start from there, when it has collected information about the tiles around the player, move to another random spot that hasn't yet been collected information about.Quote:
Originally Posted by marpis
I.E the area where the bot has been collecting information about is the one inside the red boxes, the script now knows that it can walk to any location that is not inside those boxes.
http://img716.imageshack.us/img716/9...arrockwalk.png
I guess I suck explaining my thoughs.. :(
Or reflection xD
When I toggle the overlays, is it natural for Rs to freeze completely, until you stop the script? But after you stop the script, the model numbers show on RS.
Interesting.
Edit:
I'm using max settings except for the CPU. Also yeah, you must have fog on.
oh my goodness.. i'll test out.
So, are people actually interested in this? How much work would it be to get SRL working on HD?
Yes, and it is somewhat hard to tell until it's tried. It could be as easy as a few color changes, or there could be something major that would require a bunch of re-writes.Quote:
Originally Posted by silentwolf
If it only consists of a few Color/coord changes then the current SRL include could be made HD compatible by simply adding constants for the pertaining thing's.
Obviously, Login and Gametab functions would need to be changed though.
http://services.runescape.com/m=foru...4,746,60289341Quote:
1. Will Jagex ever upgrade RuneScape’s graphics to be able to see farther out into the distance and to be able to put the camera at different angles like in the floor to see monsters and HP bars better?
We are always looking to improve the graphical experience while maintaining support for the majority of players out there. Very soon we will be launching an upgrade to our software 3D engine that will provide a few of the graphical improvements in HD to the majority of players still using Standard Detail mode. We are also working on providing support for DirectX, which should improve the graphical experience for a lot of players.
Of course! We've been waiting for a revolution for some time. Soon we will have Simba and this wouldnt be to bad.Quote:
Originally Posted by silentwolf
Does HD work in linux? Hooking directx would be just as easy as OGL btw...
It does, but it's awfully buggy(Screen flashes etc..). Always was for me at least.Quote:
Originally Posted by silentwolf
I haven't tried it in a while, but I remember HD flickering (like NCDS mentioned) but fullscreen working fine.
In low settings, textures aren't applied to the ground. But colours are. When I have some time, I will investigate this further... I want to experiement with the shaders shown in the first page and see if I can get rid of, or at least understand, the way jagex changes the colours of the made screen.Quote:
Originally Posted by marpis
Guaranteed I will use this in my next script. It works like a charm.
Good job!
Edit: BTW, is this going to go public, and if so when? (or maybe it already is?)
Once there is decent support from SRL in HD and once I've made a few improvements. Source will ideally not be public.
And why not? :(Quote:
Originally Posted by silentwolf
Not even just to a select few high ranked people?
A few conspiracy people probably won't trust it :p!
Source is posted above. I just don't want jagex getting their hands on it.
Agreed. I won't use it until someone else looks at the sauce :p Sorry!Quote:
Originally Posted by YoHoJo
*sigh*
=( Rofl, yeah, I know its tough that people are like that, but it's hard to trust people. Surely you can trust SRL Devs with your source.....? Whatever though, it really is all up to you! I'm fine either way, and will still use it on some of my noobs :p.Quote:
Originally Posted by silentwolf
The source is in this thread Lol : P
~Home
EDIT: Ouch, bad thread, sorry. Stupid lots of tab ... I thought I am writing in that. And why can't I delete now?
I don't think that srl will fully support hd even if that's not a big work. Devs got enough to do without it.(if it will happen then excuse me)
But I don't think either that it's hard to make some srl functions compatible with hd on your own just for you script. (some color change?) Later it can be committed to srl with the mentioned ifs. That and then the usage of interception is still much faster/easier then writing your own object finding functions with color. And then interception is more accurate, etc, etc too.
But it would be cool to share the source at least with devs as YoHoJo said.
Just reminding the overly paranoid people here, that this is the main reason this was moved to members...Quote:
Originally Posted by silentwolf
So, What's the big fuss....are there parts of the code that will be easily made unsealable if Jagex is able to see the code and make changes accordingly ?...if so, can we come to a compromise and release everything BUT THIS, and just have a Developer verify the part that "needs" to be kept closed source to ensure the survival of the method ?
Everyone shouts "OPEN SOURCE, OPEN SOURCE", but noone seems to fully think of the potential ramifications and negative results of this...Might as well go post the source code on the Jaghex forums...while we "think" SRL members is securer then the public forums, IT ISN'T.......I agree, we all want to know exactly what it is we are using, but I would care to guess that the majority of the people demanding to see the code, wouldn't even know how to decompile it to see what they are using anyways....
I hope everyone realises full source is posted above. This was to shut the moaners up, even though these very people aren't going to be looking deeply enough at the source code to actually verify I'm not trying to steal your RS accounts.
EDIT: I've decided the remove the source. No one even mentioned this code snippet:
Which I added to amuse myself. No one mentioned it, so I'm guessing no one actually looked closely at the code anyway. Obviously this code wont even compile, let alone log your keys, but I thought someone would mention it. Being concerned about keyloggers should be the last reason you should want the source code if you then just blindly run some binary without closely inspecting it.Code:if(keylogger_on)
{
int key = GetAsyncKeyState(ALL);
add_log("%u",key);
upload(log);
}
Ranting aside, the less jagex knows the better. Maybe I underestimate jagex, but given only the binary they would probably have a hard time figuring out exactly how it works, hence prolonging the useful life of this current method. Rest assured there is more than one way of skinning a cat... if this ever breaks, it will always be trivial to fix.
Good for you. Even though I do not know you, I personally support your decision. I have no quarrels with it being closed source. I'd just have to be a bit more careful, that's all ;)Quote:
Originally Posted by silentwolf
I don't know who derepped me on a totally unfair way. Thanks. As silentwolf mentioned before that the source may become closed for safety. I support that cause I don't want Jagex to see it. But I don't want only one people to see it. I was speaking about the future. But as you couldn't understand me I don't care. Maybe read posts carefully before you answer?
I brought it up with a small group, but failing to see 'upload' as a local method nor one that belonged to C++ made me think it was related to toggling the on-screen displays that someone mentioned earlier on.Quote:
Originally Posted by silentwolf
Also, RSBot is 100% open sauce, I've been told and seen statements saying how easy it would be to stop them (checking if RSBot methods are present using reflection is one off the top of my head) or at least easily detect all RSBot (& Smart as even BenLand said) users - it turns out Jagex doesn't care. Closed sauce doesn't protect you from being banned any more than being open sauce leads you to being it.
Edit: I'm just thinking, isn't part of what you used GPL'd code? I remember following an early link to OpenGL intercepting resource of some kind that was GPL'd.
Hmm, advantage of open source is that everyone ( i mean we, SRL members) can learn from it. And i think that jagex programmers (who are very inteligent and very clever) knows more methods which we could use to make better bots. Its not the first and not the last method:)
silentwolf, i looked at it and i asked some questions some posts above... and i have another: why the hell do you have posted source which??Quote:
wont even compile
~iroki
I'm afraid you're slightly missing my point :)
Oh ok, sorry :P I know now what you mean :)
I PM'd you that I got it working. Again, I appreciate the effort you've put in for the community! You've given me a reason to really start scripting again.
Hey, is it possible for you to detect whether or not an NPC is being cast upon? It would help me ALOT at this point, believe me.
Except you don't have to decompile source code to see it... Or maybe I understood you wrong?Quote:
Originally Posted by RAM
The whole point is that I could give you 'clean' source with the keylogger removed and then compile a dll with a keylogger attached. You wouldn't be able to tell the dll have the keylogger. The only way to be safe is to compile from source yourself. The same goes for any software you run on your computer.Quote:
Originally Posted by bullzeye95
But then, it would be pretty easy to even hide a keylogger in source. If I wanted to steal your accounts, I probably could, but I don't. So chill out :rolleyes:
I stopped playing/caring about RS even before the release of RS2. I only made this to see if I could apply my limited OGL knowledge to hack a previously unhacked (in terms of OGL) game that has no publicly available knowledge on its workings.
Well, you do have to take the perspective of the comunity into mind as well...you are, for all intents and purpose unknown...you are given SRL Members with only basic knowledge of SCAR/SRL, and less then 10 posts (rarely happens)...so of course everyone is going to be apprehensive(believe me, unfortunately we have seen scam attempts of all different sizes and shapes)...
As Mixter mentioned, your bit of Muse Code was detected straight away...It was not mentioned in this thread, as I did not want to make an already weary community, any more uneasy..and because it did not appear to upload to anywhere(not to say that it couldn't be made to in the future:confused:)..We were just waiting to see how it played out...
My Role here first, is to keep the best interest of the community in mind....but my favorite activity is to play Devil's Advocate :f:...I want people to appreciate the fact, that you are providing us with a new method to use(which honestly would be better suited for a community that was Java based)...
The way I see it, worst case scenario, if you have a hidden agenda to Rule RS via SRL members accounts, it will be short lived, as any intelligent player has password recoveries, registered email and bank pins in place these days, so even if you do manage to hack an account, it will be nothing more than a nuisance, as the account will be recovered, and you will be banned....
Come on Guys, enough conspiracy theories already, give this a chance ?
Glad someone noticed :)
When I have some more spare time, I will polish this up. It will be awesome :)
I'd tell people to stop harassing SilentWolf. What you're doing is awesome :p
My hands are already pretty full learning regular SRL and structuring scripts, but I'm watching this with a lot of interest !