:duh: I forgot about html 5. This will do it the best IMHO.
Printable View
Not all browsers support HTML5 (Correct me if I'm wrong).
I would love to see us have a custom SRL flash player.. That would be pretty cool IMO.
If you want something that most browsers play, use Theora or WebM. Also, for the website, HTML 5 seems fine. Anyone using a browser that doesn't support HTML 5 doesn't deserve to be here. :)
Please keep Flash out. The same for H.264... Although we could offer video's both in h.264 and WebM / Theora.
I'm a flash developer for the living. I believe I was the only that was yelling 'FLASH! FLASH! FLASH!'. I honestly don't know any reason not to use it. It's fast and since as3.0 the code is cleaner, better and more programming like than pascal script will ever be.
Poll ends in a few days, get your votes in!
would it make more sense to make it themed for the forums? IE
http://i54.tinypic.com/2a9uy52.jpg
Yes. Yes, it would, but I don't know if they were planning on moving the forums soon to a different theme and or new system too? If that was the case it would make sense to do it like it is now, but otherwise what you have posted would look the best... Or so I think.
Edit: would also like to see more people vote.. Kind of disappointing that only about half of the people have voted in this as opposed to the white vs brown bread thread....
Silent SPY's is nice and clean, the watermarks in the background of Frements make it harder to read and is too distracting IMHO
~shut
Silent SPY got my vote. Although I think Frement (2) is also nice.
Speaking as a aspiring web dev, please don't flash at all. Use more open standards like h.264 or similar.
Almost any new mobile phone will at least somewhat support HTML5 standards. Apple and Android phones are the best, actually, as everything since v1 (of either) at least support some HTML5 (and it's actually a good amount for any practical use).
Don't go with flash.. HTML5 + jQuery will suffice for whatever.
And Wizzup?, Mango supports HTML5 standards, so that's not a real issue, not that mobile support matters that much, really.. just have a m.villavu.com.
IE8 doesn't have support for HTML5 btw. And there's not even any reason to detect if they have html5 in jQuery.. no need for those added trips. Just if lt ie9 or whatever it is, or just have m.villavu.com be "dumb" and assume there's no html5 support (which would be a bit silly, as most phones that will be connecting to the mobile site will have html5 support.
(And by IE8 doesn't have support, I just mean it doesn't have *most* support, not that I even know why any HTML5 is needed for anything that villavu is doing, but whatever.)
Are you sure you know what he's talking about? I can clearly see what he's saying and it is a bit annoying, imo.
You said less than or equal to, and I was pointing out the equal to part. ;p
Oh, I just re-read it.. my bad, you're right.
(Again, I'm at work and have been for the past 8 hours.. about 7 left until I go home.. brain's exhausted.)
I'm assuming you're talking about the watermark, like he said. The background that has a bunch of words describing SRL in which case it's only noticeable if you look for it. The only way I can see it being annoying is if you put your monitor at an extremely awkward angle, otherwise I completely disagree and can't see how it can possibly be distracting.
Won't matter much, but my girlfriend agrees and says Frement (2) is most aesthetically pleasing. That's coming from an outside source, obviously.
No worries :p. 15 hour day? Ouch.... I feel your pain though (sort of) I've been doing some coding projects for friends of mine to get experience... Seems to eat the entire day and your head feels like an over inflated balloon afterwards.
@ the watermark, I too find it kind of distracting, and too busy for my taste. That's why I left it out of my design.
im not saying its too bold, im saying that you can just see it, and as the saying goes, "what has been seen cannot be unseen"
so it sort of draws your attention because your constantly un-purposely focusing on it slightly, enough to make it a distraction
~shut
Okay, I can understand that. I disagree with it, but I understand the reasoning. It's not like its and extremely long/detailed page so there's not a lot to be distracted from. Not to mention you choose to look at it after you've noticed it, no ones forcing you to. :p
I feel like Silent's is missing something and the watermark captures that missing element.
I still don't like the watermark. Just too "verbose" I guess. Bad word for it, but it's just an awful lot in the background.
It might be better if the Watermark was toned down a bit and in not quite as noticeable.
~BraK
Crowded is the word I would use. It seems noticeable enough for me.. It just doesn't float my boat when it has text behind text :( that's the main killer for me. Sometimes being not being obvious is a bad thing, because people notice it, but don't really notice what it is saying. It just sort of becomes a blur and makes the rest of the page hard to read. I wouldn't have a problem with it if it didn't go under everything Kind of like the background on these forums is left to the side to make it easier to read the posts, which are displayed on a very light blue/grey. Easier on the eyes IMHO.
/ยข2
Haha alright guys, agree to disagree? :p
Frement2 is still best imo