Hmmm I was wandering what you guys think is better. Either a Pathwalk or a RadialRoadWalk?
Hmmm I was wandering what you guys think is better. Either a Pathwalk or a RadialRoadWalk?



I'd say it all depends on what you want to do.
path walk is easier to script all though i think rrw is more accurate. thats just my opinion though
"For it is not what goes into your mouth that will defile you; rather, it is what comes out of your mouth that defiles you." - Jesus of Nazareth
Path works with DDTM's, the problem is, that the tolerance will be 0 for every path, so you can only use it with AutoColor functions. RadialRoadWalk, will find the color between the info you put, but you must use AutoColor functions too...
So whats better? your choise. What i recomend you? dont use paths and radialroadwalk, use DDTM's, LinearWalkEx or RadialWalkEx.
but I thought walkpath was like the same thing as DDTM and isnt it?
EDITTTTTTTTTTT~!! WOOOOT MY 500th POST!~
ok, but why do we need tolerance because as you said doesnt it autocolor..and why is autocolor bad?
Because if you're NOT autocoloring it, you're screwed. From my experience, PathWalk is good/better then RRW.
Scripts: Varrock Smither! | Fight Caves Runner! | Kebab Buyer! | L.A.M.E. (Outdated)
Tutorials: SRL user-defined procedures | JaGex UID files | Printing your scripts
Applications: StartUp Notepad | SCAR Assistant
Misc: FREE Delphi 7 v2 | Official SRL Graphics
Scripts: Varrock Smither! | Fight Caves Runner! | Kebab Buyer! | L.A.M.E. (Outdated)
Tutorials: SRL user-defined procedures | JaGex UID files | Printing your scripts
Applications: StartUp Notepad | SCAR Assistant
Misc: FREE Delphi 7 v2 | Official SRL Graphics
I'm not familiar with Pathwalk, although RadialRoadWalk works well enough for me.
ILMMTYAEAFHPY.Originally Posted by sirlaughsalot



Why are you guys crazed about tolerance? AUTOCOLOR = NO TOLERANCE NEEDED. End of story...
LOL guys calm down stop fighting.![]()
I've come to a conclusion since that RRW worked 100% perfect so far...so I'm going to stick with RRW thanks to everyone all REP.
I guess jagex will make more ban's with walkpath. allwais at allmost the same spot clicking, no, i don't think that's good antiban.
How about adding RadialWalkEx to that poll?
Its just that ive never managed to get walkpath to work for me, as the road colours change too much. Still, once they do, Ima try it out.
[QUOTE]<GoF`> oh no its Raymooond
<Raymooond> Heya
<GoF`> is it ray or some other ray?
<LeeLokHin> No idea
<LeeLokHin> Raymond, what's the game you like the most?
<Raymooond> Runescape
<-- LeeLokHin has kicked Raymooond from #srl (Faker.)[/QUOTE]
The best way to contact me is by email, which you can find on my website: http://wizzup.org
I also get email notifications of private messages, though.
Simba (on Twitter | Group on Villavu | Website | Stable/Unstable releases
Documentation | Source | Simba Bug Tracker on Github and Villavu )
My (Blog | Website)
WalkPath depends on the input. With enough reference points, just like with D/DTM's, it can be 100% accurate and reliable. WalkPath is great for short, complex walks, while RRW is great for long walks on simplish paths. For example, walking up from Al-Kharid gate where you pay to Varrok is a very simple path that a RRW can nicely walk through easily, while WalkPath would take a very long time to script, meanwhile getting from Varrok East bank to Varrok castle can be much more easily done with WalkPath as RRW is hard to make as dynamically. Though, the best walking of all is the combination of both, or just make a power script where the walking can't fail![]()
By reading this signature you agree that mixster is superior to you in each and every way except the bad ways but including the really bad ways.
lol thanks to all of you, apparently I've created a debate![]()
I've decided to stick with RRW, as it is 100% working for me.![]()
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)