Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 26 to 40 of 40

Thread: Well, it finally happened...

  1. #26
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Hyrule
    Posts
    8,662
    Mentioned
    179 Post(s)
    Quoted
    1870 Post(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Flight View Post
    I really believe that's it's a reason for the recent bans, yes.
    idk about that - this was from the past week (broke b/c of update). I've been running multiple accounts various scripts past several months - all on smart w/o an issue.




    Also how long were you botting? And you are 100% you haven't used any other botting scripts or programs the past 4 months? Did the script ever get stuck or anything? Hopefully you didn't just leave the default settings in there (breaks and what-not)

  2. #27
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Posts
    1,258
    Mentioned
    40 Post(s)
    Quoted
    588 Post(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Ashaman88 View Post
    idk about that - this was from the past week (broke b/c of update). I've been running multiple accounts various scripts past several months - all on smart w/o an issue.




    Also how long were you botting? And you are 100% you haven't used any other botting scripts or programs the past 4 months? Did the script ever get stuck or anything? Hopefully you didn't just leave the default settings in there (breaks and what-not)
    I think a good point to bring up is that when people are targeting the official client (with smart anyways) they're only playing 1 account with that machine (be it vps, vm, etc). Thus 1 cache per active bot (plus potentially other factors, ips, unique hardware, etc that we don't/unsure about jagex using to link/flag accounts).
    So while there might be (I'm positive there would be) a lower ban rate via targeting the official client, that however doesn't mean that it being an official client or not is actually the main reason behind that statistic.

    @Flight what are your thoughts about that ^?

  3. #28
    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    Posts
    56
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Quoted
    31 Post(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by o0Matthius0o View Post
    My main account has now been banned. I was using ashamans agility script. I believe i will be quitting the game now due to the amount of time and effort it took to get that account to where it was. Also there was quite a bit of wealth on that account which really makes me sad to see it go.

    I put in an appeal saying someone else was using the account but i dont think that will do any good.

    See you guys later.
    This is why I have created an army and refuse to use my main to bot. I just transfer wealth over when needed.

  4. #29
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    2,147
    Mentioned
    221 Post(s)
    Quoted
    1068 Post(s)

    Default

    All the recent anecdotal evidence points to SMART (and botting in general) being detected upon extended investigation, which is triggered by a number of things, such as automatic Botwatch flagging, player reports, inhuman playing times, and patterns of behavior across players (1000 people using a script behaving the exact same way ingame).

    Advanced script antiban prevents this extended investigation from happening as it fools the "flagging" aspect. That's why people running good antiban scripts on SMART have no issues and no bans. Player reports can be minimized by doing less cliche botting activities, and inhuman playing times is totally up to the user. Using scripts that everyone else uses is also up to the user.

    From my upcoming paper proposal on implementing biometrics into Simba and SRL-6:



    I then go on to say how this betrayal overtime is likely compounded when hundreds of players are doing the exact same thing.
    No matter what shapes and such we use, it all eventually sums into a detectable result if everyone is using a script with the same antiban.

    The presence of SMART is just an added factor. The overall goal of biometrics (and the other software/hardware spoofing recommendations I make) is to make us totally safe regardless of whether our accounts receive the extended investigation.

    It's time for us to change our playbook.
    Last edited by Clarity; 11-03-2014 at 07:29 PM.

  5. #30
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    OKC
    Posts
    123
    Mentioned
    5 Post(s)
    Quoted
    56 Post(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Flight View Post
    3rd party client ban strikes again. Why not build another account and bot up to what you had before? It will take some time but the sooner you start the sooner you'l reach that goal.
    Thats true. But the amount of questing i did was ridiculous. And most of the bots here do not work for me. They will run less than an hour most of the time. And writing a bot for everything seems a bit much for me at the moment.

    When i botted back in the day i had a laptop that the scripts seem to run well on. But i dont have that one anymore. I have an amazing custom built pc. But for some reasons scripts dont seem to run on it as well. I have discussed this with clarity and i cannot come up with a solution.

  6. #31
    Join Date
    Jul 2014
    Location
    PNW
    Posts
    53
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Quoted
    31 Post(s)

    Default

    I have been using the ashaman's ape atoll course a lot and I think the reason for your ban could be from the random challenge they have added. At least I think it is new as i just noticed it for the first time a few days ago. A random challenge screen will pop up challenging you to do a certain amount of laps and you have to click accept. I have seen it happen a couple times now and the script will just get stuck on the screen and move the camera and mouse around.

  7. #32
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Colorado
    Posts
    7,421
    Mentioned
    268 Post(s)
    Quoted
    1442 Post(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by No Lifer View Post
    I think a good point to bring up is that when people are targeting the official client (with smart anyways) they're only playing 1 account with that machine (be it vps, vm, etc). Thus 1 cache per active bot (plus potentially other factors, ips, unique hardware, etc that we don't/unsure about jagex using to link/flag accounts).
    So while there might be (I'm positive there would be) a lower ban rate via targeting the official client, that however doesn't mean that it being an official client or not is actually the main reason behind that statistic.

    @Flight what are your thoughts about that ^?
    When I see a ban here on SRL I always look for the same factors, starting with the most obvious known reasons of being banned, such as the user recently using a java-based bot. I also compare the bans in RS3 and OSRS as they're generally the same type of ban (macroing major). I can only go off of what I read as well as my own personal experience. I've had an account permanently banned (in OSRS) who was running a private color-only script via SMART. I simply believe the account was reported in-game which led the detection system to check my game client.

    From what I've read here and on Mopar's forums it is extremely easy for Jagex to know if we're playing on the official client or not. And I believe they've recently started doing this, targeting players who're suspected of botting, which makes sense to me to limit the number of accounts they ban for this. Could you imagine if every player who's used a 3rd party client was banned at the same time? That's a huge number of players.

    Current projects:
    [ AeroGuardians (GotR minigame), Motherlode Miner, Blast furnace ]

    "I won't fall in your gravity. Open your eyes,
    you're the Earth and I'm the sky..."


  8. #33
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    159
    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)
    Quoted
    90 Post(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Justin View Post
    I'm botting on an account with 3B+ in wealth :\
    My advice would be to transfer some/all the wealth to another account with a great password and security. Even if you got a ban there would still be gp left to easily make a recovery, although a slow one there would be no need to spend time making gp. Perhaps I should not ask and demand instead, don't lose your main. Bans aren't intended they just happen and even an expert like yourself is bound to make a human mistake at some point, maybe a detectable mistake too.

    Do you use the smart client or the real rs3 client?

  9. #34
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    5,125
    Mentioned
    275 Post(s)
    Quoted
    901 Post(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Trollcrank View Post
    My advice would be to transfer some/all the wealth to another account with a great password and security. Even if you got a ban there would still be gp left to easily make a recovery, although a slow one there would be no need to spend time making gp. Perhaps I should not ask and demand instead, don't lose your main. Bans aren't intended they just happen and even an expert like yourself is bound to make a human mistake at some point, maybe a detectable mistake too.

    Do you use the smart client or the real rs3 client?
    I don't need GP to make a recovery, just ask @NKN; .

    I've had a good run with macroing, if they can find me and detect me as a bot then job well done, I deserve the ban.

    I use the Official RS3 client on a VM but that's about to change soon with some new information that was 'released'

    Forum account issues? Please send me a PM

  10. #35
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Hyrule
    Posts
    8,662
    Mentioned
    179 Post(s)
    Quoted
    1870 Post(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Justin View Post
    I don't need GP to make a recovery, just ask @NKN; .

    I've had a good run with macroing, if they can find me and detect me as a bot then job well done, I deserve the ban.

    I use the Official RS3 client on a VM but that's about to change soon with some new information that was 'released'
    Do tell

  11. #36
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    5,125
    Mentioned
    275 Post(s)
    Quoted
    901 Post(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Ashaman88 View Post
    Do tell
    https://villavu.com/forum/showthread...66#post1317066

    Dot point 5 under Simba

    Forum account issues? Please send me a PM

  12. #37
    Join Date
    Nov 2014
    Posts
    104
    Mentioned
    12 Post(s)
    Quoted
    59 Post(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Justin View Post
    I am still not sold on that one. I would have to do tests to be 100% certain. But I'm pretty sure TeamViewer and similar programs use SendInput. Even some mouse & keyboard drivers use SendInput. So yeah, you can use this to detect if the event was injected, but you can't base a ban off that.

    Anyway, there are ways to get around that SendInput problem, and it's definitely easier than fixing many of the other things he listed.

  13. #38
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    England
    Posts
    3,072
    Mentioned
    296 Post(s)
    Quoted
    1094 Post(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by akarigar View Post
    I am still not sold on that one. I would have to do tests to be 100% certain. But I'm pretty sure TeamViewer and similar programs use SendInput. Even some mouse & keyboard drivers use SendInput. So yeah, you can use this to detect if the event was injected, but you can't base a ban off that.

    Anyway, there are ways to get around that SendInput problem, and it's definitely easier than fixing many of the other things he listed.
    List em!

  14. #39
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    The Future.
    Posts
    5,600
    Mentioned
    396 Post(s)
    Quoted
    1598 Post(s)

    Default

    Personally, I never worry about bans or client detectability on this website.
    Sorry for your loss though OP. If you need any money or anything, my old account might have some left over you can have.


    Quote Originally Posted by akarigar View Post
    I am still not sold on that one. I would have to do tests to be 100% certain. But I'm pretty sure TeamViewer and similar programs use SendInput. Even some mouse & keyboard drivers use SendInput. So yeah, you can use this to detect if the event was injected, but you can't base a ban off that.

    Anyway, there are ways to get around that SendInput problem, and it's definitely easier than fixing many of the other things he listed.
    What? Mouse and keyboard drivers CANNOT use SendInput because it is a userland function and drivers are kernel level.. They must use only what is defined in Ntoskrnl.h and other kernel headers from the Windows driver development kit (WDDK) or else send a signal to a service to do it for them.

    Other than that, you are right.

    P.S. SendInput uses the keyboard and mouse driver so if your driver invoked it (if you could have), you'd have an infinite loop between calls (or a kernel panic). Your driver calls SendInput which invokes the functions in your driver which invokes SendInput and so on.. There's no reason a keyboard or mouse driver would ever use SendInput.
    Last edited by Brandon; 11-12-2014 at 06:10 AM.
    I am Ggzz..
    Hackintosher

  15. #40
    Join Date
    Nov 2014
    Posts
    104
    Mentioned
    12 Post(s)
    Quoted
    59 Post(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Brandon View Post
    Personally, I never worry about bans or client detectability on this website.
    Sorry for your loss though OP. If you need any money or anything, my old account might have some left over you can have.




    What? Mouse and keyboard drivers CANNOT use SendInput because it is a userland function and drivers are kernel level.. They must use only what is defined in Ntoskrnl.h and other kernel headers from the Windows driver development kit (WDDK) or else send a signal to a service to do it for them.

    Other than that, you are right.

    P.S. SendInput uses the keyboard and mouse driver so if your driver invoked it (if you could have), you'd have an infinite loop between calls (or a kernel panic). Your driver calls SendInput which invokes the functions in your driver which invokes SendInput and so on.. There's no reason a keyboard or mouse driver would ever use SendInput.
    Good to know. I wasn't aware of that. I just remember playing around with this stuff once upon a time and my keystrokes were being shown as injected. Not certain why.

    Quote Originally Posted by Brandon View Post
    Other than that, you are right.
    Well, good to hear I got something right

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •