View Poll Results: Would you pay for ScarScape?

Voters
40. This poll is closed
  • Yes

    1 2.50%
  • No

    39 97.50%
Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 51

Thread: Who would pay for ScarScape?

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Middle of Here and There
    Posts
    417
    Mentioned
    6 Post(s)
    Quoted
    25 Post(s)

    Default Who would pay for ScarScape?

    As some may or may not have noticed, ScarScape is (I think, at least for me) broken.

    I was wondering.. Who would pay for ScarScape if it became pay only?

    I would, because it would greatly improve the accuracy of my DTM's (>.<)

    Post here your opinions, and vote in the poll.

    ~ProphesyOfWolf

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Estonia.
    Posts
    1,938
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Quoted
    2 Post(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ProphesyOfWolf View Post
    As some may or may not have noticed, ScarScape is (I think, at least for me) broken.

    I was wondering.. Who would pay for ScarScape if it became pay only?

    I would, because it would greatly improve the accuracy of my DTM's (>.<)

    Post here your opinions, and vote in the poll.

    ~ProphesyOfWolf
    What's wrong with your accuracy of DTM's?
    Is it because of the mini map rotating?
    Just add some Area size and tolerance.
    ~Eerik~

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    4,810
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Quoted
    3 Post(s)

    Default

    Who needs SS when you've got SMART?

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    NC, USA.
    Posts
    4,429
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Quoted
    4 Post(s)

    Default

    I would not. It has been free, and it should stay free. BTW, it is a better challenge with out it. (Using the acctual RS client)
    Quote Originally Posted by irc
    [00:55:29] < Guest3097> I lol at how BenLand100 has become noidea
    [01:07:40] <@BenLand100> i'm not noidea i'm
    [01:07:44] -!- BenLand100 is now known as BenLand42-
    [01:07:46] <@BenLand42-> shit
    [01:07:49] -!- BenLand42- is now known as BenLand420
    [01:07:50] <@BenLand420> YEA

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Middle of Here and There
    Posts
    417
    Mentioned
    6 Post(s)
    Quoted
    25 Post(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by NaumanAkhlaQ View Post
    Who needs SS when you've got SMART?
    My computer can't run SMART, so yeah.

    About the DTM's. I said DTM's, not DDTM's. For some reason, the colors are terribly inaccurate with the RuneScape window. THAT'S why I want SS.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Estonia.
    Posts
    1,938
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Quoted
    2 Post(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ProphesyOfWolf View Post
    My computer can't run SMART, so yeah.

    About the DTM's. I said DTM's, not DDTM's. For some reason, the colors are terribly inaccurate with the RuneScape window. THAT'S why I want SS.
    You can add Areashape to normal DDTM's too?
    For the colors, just add tolerance.
    And could you tell us the problem you are getting with smart, maybe we can help?
    ~Eerik~

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Middle of Here and There
    Posts
    417
    Mentioned
    6 Post(s)
    Quoted
    25 Post(s)

    Default

    Same as everyone - Computer sucks, gets stuck at 80%.

    Got it to work once, but then it phailed.

    Besides, I think Sythe deserves some payment for the great job he did on SS.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Ohio
    Posts
    1,103
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ProphesyOfWolf View Post
    Same as everyone - Computer sucks, gets stuck at 80%.

    Got it to work once, but then it phailed.

    Besides, I think Sythe deserves some payment for the great job he did on SS.
    If this works it will really make your day! This problem used to happen to me until I changed a something.
    SCAR Code:
    Smartsetup(prefix,true,true,false);//this is normally how people setup their SMART(which doesn't work for you)
    SCAR Code:
    //This is the layout of SmartSetup
    SmartSetup(prefix, safe, signed, superDetail);
    This is what I heard from someone, "if you change the signed boolean to false it will work!".
    So now try this
    SCAR Code:
    Smartsetup(prefix,true,false,false);//all i did was change it to false for signed.
    Tell me if it works for you aswell.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Colombia. Bogotá D.C
    Posts
    720
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Default

    Yeh why would anyone pay for ScarScape if we have smart, unless you are lazy on getting RadialWalk and that stuff getting to work, I would be lazier to pay
    -------------------------------------------------------------------


  10. #10
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Het ademt zwaar en moedeloos vannacht.
    Posts
    7,211
    Mentioned
    26 Post(s)
    Quoted
    72 Post(s)

    Default

    If it wasn't ******* detectable, wasn't useless due to reflection, and wasn't ******* easy to make, and if I actually wanted to pay for RS besides for p2p, maybe.
    I made a new script, check it out!.

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    2,593
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Default

    I would absolutely not pay.

    However, I do think that the community should collect a donation if we wanted to support it. But it shouldn't be a Pay-To-Get deal..

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    27
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Default

    I wouldn't pay for it at all, prehaps if it was a "week free" thing, then if I made any money from botting using it, I would pay a small amount of the money I made, I'm not going to invest in it though.

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Program TEXAS home of AUTOERS
    Posts
    7,934
    Mentioned
    26 Post(s)
    Quoted
    237 Post(s)

    Default

    lol ive never used scarscape in my life, and never will its for noobs and stay for noob scripters.

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    2,593
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Default

    So, JuKKa is a noob?

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Program TEXAS home of AUTOERS
    Posts
    7,934
    Mentioned
    26 Post(s)
    Quoted
    237 Post(s)

    Default

    Yes

    lol... jp but its like dan always say's...

    Reflection Sucks. Don't use it unless you're dumb. - Dan's The Man
    sooooooo thats what im saying.

  16. #16
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    2,593
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Default

    Reflection has nothing to do with ScarScape.

    Plus, there is no reason to not use Reflection.
    Unless it wouldn't have been created.

  17. #17
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Program TEXAS home of AUTOERS
    Posts
    7,934
    Mentioned
    26 Post(s)
    Quoted
    237 Post(s)

    Default

    its our opinion...
    it did ask if we like to pay for scarscape... so i said my opinion so dont hate it..

    and reflection is too easyyy.

  18. #18
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    2,593
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Default

    But still. Why did you say something [which was totally off-topic] about Reflection if we're discussing the probable future payment options of ScarScape.

    And, if Reflection's too easy, then why was it developed by SRL Devs?

  19. #19
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    NC, USA.
    Posts
    4,429
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Quoted
    4 Post(s)

    Default

    It was not, a few SRL members and like one or two Devs.
    Quote Originally Posted by irc
    [00:55:29] < Guest3097> I lol at how BenLand100 has become noidea
    [01:07:40] <@BenLand100> i'm not noidea i'm
    [01:07:44] -!- BenLand100 is now known as BenLand42-
    [01:07:46] <@BenLand42-> shit
    [01:07:49] -!- BenLand42- is now known as BenLand420
    [01:07:50] <@BenLand420> YEA

  20. #20
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    2,593
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by noidea View Post
    It was not, a few SRL members and like one or two Devs.
    -.-

  21. #21
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    NC, USA.
    Posts
    4,429
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Quoted
    4 Post(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by TheVoiceInYourHead View Post
    And, if Reflection's too easy, then why was it developed by SRL Devs?
    Here you make it sound like all of them made it .
    Quote Originally Posted by irc
    [00:55:29] < Guest3097> I lol at how BenLand100 has become noidea
    [01:07:40] <@BenLand100> i'm not noidea i'm
    [01:07:44] -!- BenLand100 is now known as BenLand42-
    [01:07:46] <@BenLand42-> shit
    [01:07:49] -!- BenLand42- is now known as BenLand420
    [01:07:50] <@BenLand420> YEA

  22. #22
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Ohio
    Posts
    1,103
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Default

    Did the thing I posted earlier work for you? Cause if it did we could end all of the bickering very easily.

  23. #23
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Middle of Here and There
    Posts
    417
    Mentioned
    6 Post(s)
    Quoted
    25 Post(s)

    Default

    Not at home, so yeh. And believe me, making the client unsigned doesn't work for me. I've tried (I lost like 5 hours of sleep over it the other day >.>).

    You guys really think that Sythe should just put all this work into something for us, and that he deserves no payment at all? He's right.. Freeloading to the max O.O

    I did not intend to turn this into a flaming thread. I was simply asking for a yes or no answer, and maybe some explaining why or why not. Not some huge argument over Reflection. I don't want to hear another thing about it. I'm sure there are reflection flaming threads elsewhere (sorry to those SRL members this is directed towards, but this isn't the right place).

    ~ProphesyOfWolf

  24. #24
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Ohio
    Posts
    1,103
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ProphesyOfWolf View Post
    Not at home, so yeh. And believe me, making the client unsigned doesn't work for me. I've tried (I lost like 5 hours of sleep over it the other day >.>).
    Too bad, it worked for me and a couple of other people, maybe just give it another quick try, wouldn't hurt. Well good luck!

    O also so I am not spamming random smart stuff on this thread, I don't think that I would pay for ScarScape because I don't auto much anymore, I just script and the scripts im working on don't need SS.

  25. #25
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    New Jersey
    Posts
    1,673
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Quoted
    9 Post(s)

    Default

    I woulsn't use scarscape, I script with smart included, if I couldn't do something without using SS it'd just make me try harder to get better till I got it, I don't think there's much of a point to SS, just use either R.S. regular client or smart. Plus I think I remember hearing a while ago SS is detectable not sure if it was/still is detectable.

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. About ScarScape
    By Stricker666 in forum Outdated Tutorials
    Replies: 46
    Last Post: 01-08-2009, 04:31 AM
  2. need help with scarscape!
    By ~PURESKILLA~ in forum RS3 Outdated / Broken Scripts
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 02-16-2008, 07:20 PM
  3. scarscape
    By BigJohn8742 in forum OSR Help
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 01-25-2008, 11:50 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •