Results 1 to 11 of 11

Thread: New anti-ban / auto-responder?

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Williston, ND
    Posts
    3,106
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Quoted
    3 Post(s)

    Default New anti-ban / auto-responder?

    I did some searching around, and didn't find anything like this...I thinks.

    Anyway, my idea is to use the quick-chat thing to randomly talk to people. I don't know how well this will work, or if it will, or if it's effective. I would think it might work...right? Shouldn't be too hard to add it to a script...

    Any thoughts?
    Proud owner of "Efferator" my totally boted main account!
    "You see, sometimes, science is not a guess" -Xiaobing Zhou (my past physics professor, with heavy Chinese accent)

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Alberta,Canada
    Posts
    2,358
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Default

    meh, i guess its possible, buts its alot easier to type something by what they say inchatln then it would be to find the quickchat thing, then choose the quick chat. I dunno, someone may feel like doing this, but it seems a lil bit like a waste of time to me.

    -Blumblebee
    “Ignorance, the root and the stem of every evil.”

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Williston, ND
    Posts
    3,106
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Quoted
    3 Post(s)

    Default

    Yeah, I know...it's kinda pointless, but jagex might be like "Oh hey, this guy uses quick chat, he can't be bot!"
    Proud owner of "Efferator" my totally boted main account!
    "You see, sometimes, science is not a guess" -Xiaobing Zhou (my past physics professor, with heavy Chinese accent)

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Alberta,Canada
    Posts
    2,358
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Default

    er how woud it know if a good autoresponder was being used. And using quicchat woud be kinda like saying hey im botting. I mean how many ppl do you know use quickchat?
    “Ignorance, the root and the stem of every evil.”

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    New Zealand
    Posts
    157
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Default

    Honestly I don't think it would be beneficial at all, Jagex won't think that because a user is using quick chat they can't be a bot... they are well aware of the capabilities of bots and this is well within those. Nice thought though!

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Williston, ND
    Posts
    3,106
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Quoted
    3 Post(s)

    Default

    I actually go the idea running wizzup's fisher, and there were like 5 people there using quickchat. Other than those 5 people? No-body
    Proud owner of "Efferator" my totally boted main account!
    "You see, sometimes, science is not a guess" -Xiaobing Zhou (my past physics professor, with heavy Chinese accent)

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Colombia. Bogotá D.C
    Posts
    720
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Default

    Ok Brain I wont let you down

    Well it wouldnt replace the possibility of just using TypeSend('');
    It could be like a second option people could use , to look less botty , since Ive also seen many guys that use Quick Chat, they keep on asking.... Whats
    your strength lvl and nooby stuff like that, so It could work ,
    to randomize a little more the autoresponds, so not just write but also use QuickChat to mix em and look a lot less botty, would work as an antiban also.

    It could be added to SRL Autoresoponder Includes to have it as an option or something
    -------------------------------------------------------------------


  8. #8
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    New Zealand
    Posts
    157
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Default

    I suppose it could be an option, more useful would be an include that searched for certain strings like "str lvl" or "rng lvl"... there's countless variations and then replies with a suitable quickchat answer, although I am guessing this has already been done in some form with normal chatting already?

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Williston, ND
    Posts
    3,106
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Quoted
    3 Post(s)

    Default

    ho ha!
    Dracody kinda knows what I'm talking about. Of course you wouldn't have it only auto respond with quickchat, but it is just one of the random options in the auto-responder. So sometimes it quick chats back, some times it just answers them. It seems like Tank it kinda feeling my flow as well.
    Proud owner of "Efferator" my totally boted main account!
    "You see, sometimes, science is not a guess" -Xiaobing Zhou (my past physics professor, with heavy Chinese accent)

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    include srl/srl.scar ( aussie)
    Posts
    2,875
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Default

    Err there is quickchat in SRL, in the misc folder i thhinik

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    24
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Default

    nah i think using regular chats less suspicious. but it does make u think. using quick chat would be too easy and if u think about it most people would think most bots use quick chat instead of actual typing. but its still a good idea.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Auto responder
    By dallas574 in forum OSR Help
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 08-15-2008, 01:08 PM
  2. Auto responder
    By dritar in forum OSR Help
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 10-04-2007, 06:13 PM
  3. Karajama auto nat runner with anti bans/ anti randoms
    By mike_2922 in forum RS3 Outdated / Broken Scripts
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 08-16-2007, 02:40 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •