Poll: Should SRL support P2P for RS?

Be advised that this is a public poll: other users can see the choice(s) you selected.

Results 1 to 17 of 17

Thread: Support P2P

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    #srl
    Posts
    6,102
    Mentioned
    39 Post(s)
    Quoted
    62 Post(s)

    Default Support P2P

    It seems to me that SRL should support P2P for RS aswell as F2P still.
    It wouldnt need that many changes, just a few additions to Banking Functions and maybe add some symbols to FindSymbol();

    I would be more than happy to do it, would only take 10 minutes or so.

    Just my thoughts.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Pennsylvania
    Posts
    1,524
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Quoted
    1 Post(s)

    Default

    You can just modify the functions/procedures and don't have things for P2P yourself. But most of SRL should still be compatible with P2P, the only thing I can think of is banking and things similar.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    52
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Default

    ive always ran SRL on P2P and it works fine

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Sweden
    Posts
    10,812
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Quoted
    16 Post(s)

    Default

    My question is.. "why?". What is the use? So SRL is heavier with functions that only a small majority of scripts use?


    Send SMS messages using Simba
    Please do not send me a PM asking for help; I will not be able to help you! Post in a relevant thread or make your own! And always remember to search first!

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    19
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Default

    I don't have P2P but I think you should add some stuff for members.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    #srl
    Posts
    6,102
    Mentioned
    39 Post(s)
    Quoted
    62 Post(s)

    Default

    I just dont see why not.

    It would only take about 10 lines of code to add the main P2P banks and maybe some symbols.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Pennsylvania
    Posts
    1,524
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Quoted
    1 Post(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by N C D S View Post
    I just dont see why not.

    It would only take about 10 lines of code to add the main P2P banks and maybe some symbols.
    Then write the code and I'll add it. Tell me what symbols are needed and I'll get them.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Pluto... Maybe?
    Posts
    198
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Default

    yeh i agree it would make srl appeal to more people then i guess

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Right now? Chair.
    Posts
    8,488
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Quoted
    12 Post(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Harry View Post
    My question is.. "why?". What is the use? So SRL is heavier with functions that only a small majority of scripts use?

    "a small majority" ? i wonder how you worked out that a majority can be small

    i think that at it's current state it would make sense for srl to expand to p2p.

    ~RM

    I & I know Zion. It is in the spirit, body and mind of every one of us
    RMouse(obj: TMSIObject): boolean;

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Melbourne, Australia
    Posts
    2,240
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Quoted
    11 Post(s)

    Default

    SRL would be nice if it had a greater range for members

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Alberta
    Posts
    727
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Default

    One problem would be keeping up to date. I know of a few developers that have problems getting membership.

    Quote Originally Posted by Rasta Magician View Post
    i think that at it's current state it would make sense for srl to expand to p2p.
    I think it would make sense to get the randoms and other problems that we're backlogged with already fixed. I do agree in a way however, SRL will one day need to move onto the whole new world of P2P.

    Maybe you should post some functions in the Public SVN to get some people motivated?

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Perth, Australia
    Posts
    3,926
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Quoted
    2 Post(s)

    Default

    The only reason SRL doesn't support P2P as such is the P2P world is a lot larger than F2P and getting OpenBank compatible with all P2P banks and getting information on all the symbols takes a lot longer than 10 mins. Feel free to help us out though.

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Ontario, Canada
    Posts
    7,805
    Mentioned
    5 Post(s)
    Quoted
    3 Post(s)

    Default

    There are a lot of P2P banks as well that are not like any others, like Illyeta is odd.

    It could be done, but would the effort not be better placed into Randoms etc?
    Writing an SRL Member Application | [Updated] Pascal Scripting Statements
    My GitHub

    Progress Report:
    13:46 <@BenLand100> <SourceCode> @BenLand100: what you have just said shows you 
                        have serious physchological problems
    13:46 <@BenLand100> HE GETS IT!
    13:46 <@BenLand100> HE FINALLY GETS IT!!!!1

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    #srl
    Posts
    6,102
    Mentioned
    39 Post(s)
    Quoted
    62 Post(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Nava2 View Post
    There are a lot of P2P banks as well that are not like any others, like Illyeta is odd.

    It could be done, but would the effort not be better placed into Randoms etc?
    I agree that Randoms should be first priority, but I also think this could be a nice addition into SRL.
    I'd like to think that I can have most things done by this weekend.
    (I dont have much time to work this week at all)

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    <3
    Posts
    2,683
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Default

    My opinion on this is quite simple as allways ^^

    This is the right time, There just got in a new Developer,
    means a little bit more power & SRL in it's current state is
    a finished product? Why not expand it!

  16. #16
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    1,612
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Default

    If developers need member, shouldn't fellow srl users step in an lend accounts?

    Expanding to P2P, is a good idea. I'd also be willing to give developers my main.

  17. #17
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    117
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Quoted
    2 Post(s)

    Default

    Members accounts should never be a problem. Developers can use mine anytime, I try to be in IRC as often as possible as well.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •