Poll: What should Freddy do?

Page 3 of 5 FirstFirst 12345 LastLast
Results 51 to 75 of 125

Thread: SCAR => Important

  1. #51
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Players[-1].Loc
    Posts
    962
    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)
    Quoted
    5 Post(s)

    Default

    I say GPL 3.20 so we can fix stuff ourselves and focus on 4

  2. #52
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    192.168.1.73
    Posts
    2,439
    Mentioned
    6 Post(s)
    Quoted
    119 Post(s)

    Default

    I've never switched to SCAR 3.15b, as I've never had a problem with it, and I heard bugs with 3.20d on vista.

    I'd be happy with 3.15 until 4 is out.

  3. #53
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Chile
    Posts
    1,901
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Default

    I think you should respect an order. Right now, we need the bugs posted on your forum fixed. You also have to make a quick fix for the fonts. Then go with 3.21. When you are done, you have plenty of time to finish/start SCAR 4.


  4. #54
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    1,612
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Default

    I still use Scar 3.15. But, I will probably move onto 3.20 if you fix all the bugs. Then move onto 4.0. .

    SCAR Code:
    //Smarter Child, has VISTA!

  5. #55
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Posts
    158
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Default

    I would say start with SCAR 4.0.

    I guess it would just be a nice clean new slate.


    Also, side note, is it possible to create a Mac version of SCAR? SCAR is written in Pascal I believe. Is it possible to create a mac native SCAR also? If so, that would be great! If not... WINE or dual boot for me :P
    Last edited by r3dr4g0n; 07-12-2009 at 03:24 AM.

  6. #56
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Amsterdam
    Posts
    13,692
    Mentioned
    146 Post(s)
    Quoted
    130 Post(s)

    Default

    Freddy, with all due respect, I find it a bit weird that you ask this to the public, rather than the people with experience and longevity. But that's just MO...

    Far from everyone that voted has a clue about what you just polled, plus it's implications. They are also not the ones that have to handle those implications.



    The best way to contact me is by email, which you can find on my website: http://wizzup.org
    I also get email notifications of private messages, though.

    Simba (on Twitter | Group on Villavu | Website | Stable/Unstable releases
    Documentation | Source | Simba Bug Tracker on Github and Villavu )


    My (Blog | Website)

  7. #57
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    3,861
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Quoted
    1 Post(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Feroc1ty View Post
    It will be something more like this.

    SCAR Code:
    struct Point{
       int x = 5;
       int y = 10;
    }

    Those will be initialized on struct creation, but you won't be able to add your custom initialization values for each struct created, unless freddy decides otherwise of course.

    Question, will the classes be as cheap as the records, or will they be real classes that support methods and etc.

    Also, I'm hoping new version will allow this.

    SCAR Code:
    type trigger = record
       actions:array of procedure;
    end;

    procedure addaction(trig:trigger; act:procedure);
    begin
       SetArrayLength(trig.actions, GetArrayLength(trig.actions)+1);
       trig[High(trig.actions)] := act;
    end;

    Currently this doesn't compile because you get a type mismatch, and you have to bypass that doing this.

    SCAR Code:
    type action = procedure();

    type trigger = record
       actions:array of action;
    end;

    procedure addaction(trig:trigger; act:action);
    begin
       SetArrayLength(trig.actions, GetArrayLength(trig.actions)+1);
       trig[High(trig.actions)] := act;
    end;
    That's not pascal code.. why would it work like that?

    And your problem is an easy fix if you typecast act as a ___pointer:
    SCAR Code:
    program New;

    type trigger = record
       actions:array of procedure;
    end;

    var
      T: trigger;

    procedure p1;
    begin
      writeln('1');
    end;

    procedure p2;
    begin
      writeln('2');
    end;

    procedure p3;
    begin
      writeln('3');
    end;

    procedure addaction(var trig:trigger; act:procedure);
    begin
       SetArrayLength(trig.actions, GetArrayLength(trig.actions)+1);
       trig.actions[High(trig.actions)] := ___pointer(act);
    end;

    begin
      addaction(T, @p1);
      addaction(T, @p2);
      addaction(T, @p3);
     
      T.actions[0]();
      T.actions[1]();
      T.actions[2]();
    end.

  8. #58
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    ithurtsithurtsithurtsithurts
    Posts
    2,930
    Mentioned
    7 Post(s)
    Quoted
    135 Post(s)

    Default

    Personally, I'm wondering exactly how much of SRL would have to be completely rewritten to work with the completely redesigned SCAR 4.

    Better to get 3.20 back into (mostly) complete working order, as well as fixing up at least a few of the known bugs, before working on 4.

  9. #59
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    2,155
    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)
    Quoted
    42 Post(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by senrath View Post
    Personally, I'm wondering exactly how much of SRL would have to be completely rewritten to work with the completely redesigned SCAR 4.

    Better to get 3.20 back into (mostly) complete working order, as well as fixing up at least a few of the known bugs, before working on 4.
    i agree

  10. #60
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Sydney, Australia (Faggot Region)
    Posts
    1,465
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Quoted
    11 Post(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Freddy1990 View Post
    I've decided I'll probably not need Architect which is the version I had up in my donations list, the professional version of RAD studio would cost me €125, well Delphi 2009 Pro is €107, but you know, €18 diff to get C++ builder, Delphi Prism, etc... Delphi Prism will let me use Mono and if you know what Mono does you know what that could mean Might not do it for SCAR though as my script engine probably isn't Mono-compatible seeing Mono is a .NET implementation
    I'll check that
    So how much do you need now?


  11. #61
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Amsterdam
    Posts
    3,620
    Mentioned
    5 Post(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Default

    Better leave a working version behind, go for scar 3.21
    Verrekte Koekwous

  12. #62
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Belgium
    Posts
    3,137
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Quoted
    5 Post(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Wizzup? View Post
    Freddy, with all due respect, I find it a bit weird that you ask this to the public, rather than the people with experience and longevity. But that's just MO...

    Far from everyone that voted has a clue about what you just polled, plus it's implications. They are also not the ones that have to handle those implications.
    Wizzup, with all due respect, don't disregard the end-user.

    Quote Originally Posted by Simtoon View Post
    So how much do you need now?
    About $115
    Last edited by Freddy1990; 07-11-2009 at 09:45 AM.

  13. #63
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    421
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Da 0wner View Post
    SCAR 4 ftw .

    Edit: Can't you get that rad thing through 'other means '?
    haha "other means"
    Quote Originally Posted by Cstrike View Post
    Why do I even try these things? I just shit my pants over this god damn tutorial. Fuck, that's uncleanable. I can't even wash that out because there's so much of my shit it will just stain everything else. If I put it in the washing machine, I'm sure to stain the sides.

  14. #64
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    behind you!
    Posts
    1,688
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Quoted
    40 Post(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Tickyy View Post
    Scar 4....

    but i have a question with your V3.20, since the forums are down i'll ask you here.

    SCAR Code:
    Procedure Playit;
    var
      M: TMusic;
    begin
      M:= CreateMusicPlayer;
      M.LoadFromFile(AppPath + 'Tickyy_includes\Tickyy.mp3');
      M.Play(false);
      Wait(6000);
    end;

    Is anything wrong with that, well if not then... why do i always get this error when i run the script twice:

    [Runtime Error] : Exception: [TMusic Error | Code: 14] in line 202 in script C:\.......
    Quote Originally Posted by Freddy1990 View Post

    I'll check that

    Well, you know how i can fix that, its kinda important for my next script
    Hi

  15. #65
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    The Netherlands
    Posts
    5,553
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Tickyy View Post
    Well, you know how i can fix that, its kinda important for my next script
    Try adding a '\' after AppPath + <Here>

    Since when is it able to play .mp3's?
    ~Hermen

  16. #66
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    include srl/srl.scar ( aussie)
    Posts
    2,875
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Hermen View Post
    Try adding a '\' after AppPath + <Here>

    Since when is it able to play .mp3's?
    since scar 3.15 afaik

  17. #67
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Perth, Australia
    Posts
    3,926
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Quoted
    2 Post(s)

    Default

    Since 3.20 actually.
    Last edited by ZephyrsFury; 07-11-2009 at 09:21 PM.

  18. #68
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    behind you!
    Posts
    1,688
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Quoted
    40 Post(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Hermen View Post
    Try adding a '\' after AppPath + <Here>

    Since when is it able to play .mp3's?
    no that's not the problem... -_-...

    but thx i guess...
    Hi

  19. #69
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Amsterdam
    Posts
    13,692
    Mentioned
    146 Post(s)
    Quoted
    130 Post(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Freddy1990 View Post
    Wizzup, with all due respect, don't disregard the end-user.
    I am not disregarding the end user. I know the end user wants a stable program that cooperates well with it's only big library - SRL. The end user wants to run SRL Scripts to macro a program called RuneScape...



    The best way to contact me is by email, which you can find on my website: http://wizzup.org
    I also get email notifications of private messages, though.

    Simba (on Twitter | Group on Villavu | Website | Stable/Unstable releases
    Documentation | Source | Simba Bug Tracker on Github and Villavu )


    My (Blog | Website)

  20. #70
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Belgium
    Posts
    3,137
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Quoted
    5 Post(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Wizzup? View Post
    I am not disregarding the end user. I know the end user wants a stable program that cooperates well with it's only big library - SRL. The end user wants to run SRL Scripts to macro a program called RuneScape...
    And here we are again, you're once again disregarding everyone who doesn't use SRL or use SCAR for Runescape. So you're saying because there's probably less of them that we should disregard them?

  21. #71
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Amsterdam
    Posts
    13,692
    Mentioned
    146 Post(s)
    Quoted
    130 Post(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Freddy1990 View Post
    And here we are again, you're once again disregarding everyone who doesn't use SRL or use SCAR for Runescape. So you're saying because there's probably less of them that we should disregard them?
    Well... You are posting it on SRL forums.
    There are indeed not so many people who use SCAR for anything but RuneScape.
    And as you said yourself: the majority should decide...



    The best way to contact me is by email, which you can find on my website: http://wizzup.org
    I also get email notifications of private messages, though.

    Simba (on Twitter | Group on Villavu | Website | Stable/Unstable releases
    Documentation | Source | Simba Bug Tracker on Github and Villavu )


    My (Blog | Website)

  22. #72
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Helsinki, Finland
    Posts
    1,395
    Mentioned
    30 Post(s)
    Quoted
    107 Post(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Wizzup? View Post
    I am not disregarding the end user. I know the end user wants a stable program that cooperates well with it's only big library - SRL. The end user wants to run SRL Scripts to macro a program called RuneScape...
    I agree with you at part 1 of that (stable program), I can't agree with the second, though.
    => There are us who don't use SRL Include at all... ..or play RuneScape.

    So, how about letting the users choice?

    I use SCAR for personal projects of mine, one of em is for macroing purposes on another [M]MORPG.

  23. #73
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Belgium
    Posts
    3,137
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Quoted
    5 Post(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Wizzup? View Post
    Well... You are posting it on SRL forums.
    There are indeed not so many people who use SCAR for anything but RuneScape.
    And as you said yourself: the majority should decide...
    I never said that the majority should decide and I simply post this here because people don't seem to visit my forums often enough so the vote would take forever, this is simply the highest concentration of SCAR users I can easily get in touch with in a short period of time. But anyway, I've had about enough of these ridicules fights between us, it's because of you that I had to take a break because I couldn't handle the stress anymore because I was constantly being bashed which in terms was a major setback for all of my projects. So go ahead and post your snappy reply, but don't expect another reply from me.

    As for this poll, I was never planning on starting the work on SCAR 4 before I finished at least SCAR 3.21, I was merely interested in seeing how people would handle this situation if they could decide, as a developer I wouldn't take decisions like this lightly and never leave behind something that doesn't work as well as it should before moving on. I will be setting up a subversion repository soon where I will upload SCAR 3.21 pre-release versions, this way I can fix and update bugs fast and the people who test it in terms can resume the testing faster as they have access to a fixed version faster. I'm currently using Windows 7 as a development environment, so the next versions of SCAR will probably be a bit more Vista/7 friendly, which is what I'm currently working on.

    Quote Originally Posted by Janilabo View Post
    I agree with you at part 1 of that (stable program), I can't agree with the second, though.
    => There are us who don't use SRL Include at all... ..or play RuneScape.

    So, how about letting the users choice?

    I use SCAR for personal projects of mine, one of em is for macroing purposes on another [M]MORPG.
    And even though you don't use it for RS, you provided well over half the funding required for me to build SCAR 4!

  24. #74
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Amsterdam
    Posts
    13,692
    Mentioned
    146 Post(s)
    Quoted
    130 Post(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Freddy1990 View Post
    I never said that the majority should decide and I simply post this here because people don't seem to visit my forums often enough so the vote would take forever, this is simply the highest concentration of SCAR users I can easily get in touch with in a short period of time. But anyway, I've had about enough of these ridicules fights between us, it's because of you that I had to take a break because I couldn't handle the stress anymore because I was constantly being bashed which in terms was a major setback for all of my projects. So go ahead and post your snappy reply, but don't expect another reply from me.
    First of all, I apologize for any real life stress I may have caused...
    Sorry

    Nevertheless, in my opinion I have not attacked you in this thread, I'm only trying to voice my opinion. I've been going over the posts a couple of times, and I really can't find any offensive posts, and no offense was intended.
    I treat your opinion with great care, and I wish you do the same of mine.


    Quote Originally Posted by Freddy1990 View Post
    As for this poll, I was never planning on starting the work on SCAR 4 before I finished at least SCAR 3.21, I was merely interested in seeing how people would handle this situation if they could decide, as a developer I wouldn't take decisions like this lightly and never leave behind something that doesn't work as well as it should before moving on. I will be setting up a subversion repository soon where I will upload SCAR 3.21 pre-release versions, this way I can fix and update bugs fast and the people who test it in terms can resume the testing faster as they have access to a fixed version faster. I'm currently using Windows 7 as a development environment, so the next versions of SCAR will probably be a bit more Vista/7 friendly, which is what I'm currently working on.
    Well that's great news. I, for one, didn't understand that you were going to work on 3.21 first, though...

    Quote Originally Posted by Janilabo View Post
    I agree with you at part 1 of that (stable program), I can't agree with the second, though.
    => There are us who don't use SRL Include at all... ..or play RuneScape.

    So, how about letting the users choice?

    I use SCAR for personal projects of mine, one of em is for macroing purposes on another [M]MORPG.
    And for those of you who don't use SCAR for RuneScape, there's also the SRL Community.
    I think I've already made it clear that I am very interested in macroing other games as well.
    If you keep your projects private however, there isn't much the community can do for your projects...



    The best way to contact me is by email, which you can find on my website: http://wizzup.org
    I also get email notifications of private messages, though.

    Simba (on Twitter | Group on Villavu | Website | Stable/Unstable releases
    Documentation | Source | Simba Bug Tracker on Github and Villavu )


    My (Blog | Website)

  25. #75
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    3,044
    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)
    Quoted
    21 Post(s)

    Default

    I vote for Scar 4.0, because i don't use it in Runescape and i know some people who would like to use it in other games too

    And yes, i use SCar 3,15 B.. And i see now Errors whatsoever in it
    And i think we forget who is putting his ass into this. So we can "Cheat".. Freddy doesn't get paid for what he is doing, or anything.

    Thanks Freddy for asking our opinions. And Thanks for developing this wonderful Program called Scar A.K.A Phoenix.

    ~Home

Page 3 of 5 FirstFirst 12345 LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •