Results 1 to 21 of 21

Thread: Website Remake

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    South East England
    Posts
    2,906
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Quoted
    8 Post(s)

    Default Website Remake

    This is where I am at so far;

    http://www.definition-designs.co.uk/New/


    What do you think? All of the code is valid, CSS at 2.1 and xHTML 1.1.

    Just wondering what you think of the design at the moment and the navigation bar (roll over the navigation options)
    Jus' Lurkin'

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    3,152
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Quoted
    1 Post(s)

    Default

    nifty. And the theme fits in with my computer and FF themes, so its even better. I very much like the different colored roll over options.
    SCAR Tutorials: The Form Tutorial | Types, Arrays, and Classes
    Programming Projects: NotePad | Tetris | Chess


  3. #3
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    South East England
    Posts
    2,906
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Quoted
    8 Post(s)

    Default

    I do try Dan :3
    Jus' Lurkin'

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    8,876
    Mentioned
    123 Post(s)
    Quoted
    327 Post(s)

    Default

    Uhm.. All I see is a nav bar, is that what you have made so far or is there more?

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    South East England
    Posts
    2,906
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Quoted
    8 Post(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Zyt3x View Post
    Uhm.. All I see is a nav bar, is that what you have made so far or is there more?
    Thats it. It took a while to get it to work and look right haha xD
    Jus' Lurkin'

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    21
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Default

    D: I don't like how the home/portfolio/about things are all so different colors.. But other than that.. I like it. ^^

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    2,295
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Default

    Basic but looks good

    Rogeruk's Al-Kharid Tanner V1.1 [Released]
    Rogeruk's Barbarian Crafter [Coming Soon]
    Rogeruk's Guild Fisher [Coming Soon]
    !! - Taking Requests - !!

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Canada, BC
    Posts
    728
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Default

    yeah i have to agree with ABC, the colored boxes look kinda out of sinc with grey background. I think it would look better to have the text just turn white without the colors
    Lance. Da. Pants.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    421
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Default

    Looks good, exept to much black space above the navigations, mabye a logo would fit there
    Quote Originally Posted by Cstrike View Post
    Why do I even try these things? I just shit my pants over this god damn tutorial. Fuck, that's uncleanable. I can't even wash that out because there's so much of my shit it will just stain everything else. If I put it in the washing machine, I'm sure to stain the sides.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    1,447
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Quoted
    1 Post(s)

    Default

    The text on the nav bar is too dark and doesn't stand out.
    Make the text brighter.

    I agree with ABC.

    The nav bar looks a bit too big.

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    3,152
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Quoted
    1 Post(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Torrent of Flame View Post
    I do try Dan :3
    you do try ToF. Make an abstact reference to me in your website?
    SCAR Tutorials: The Form Tutorial | Types, Arrays, and Classes
    Programming Projects: NotePad | Tetris | Chess


  12. #12
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    South East England
    Posts
    2,906
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Quoted
    8 Post(s)

    Default

    Large Space = Fills Space on the page = Easier to create minimalistic. I'm still working with the text colours. Also, it looks boring without the coloured backgrounds. In an aesthetic sense, RGB compliments dark grey.
    Jus' Lurkin'

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    513
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Default

    http://validator.w3.org/

    And I don't think you should be making your website this way... Before rollovers, color selection etc... Get everything into it's right place...

    and I don't understand the thing your doing with all the headers...

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    The Netherlands
    Posts
    5,553
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Default

    It's nice.
    Can someone PM me why you need to validate a site or something?
    ~Hermen

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    South East England
    Posts
    2,906
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Quoted
    8 Post(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by newbiezkid View Post
    http://validator.w3.org/

    And I don't think you should be making your website this way... Before rollovers, color selection etc... Get everything into it's right place...

    and I don't understand the thing your doing with all the headers...
    How do you mean? I dont think I quite understand you.

    Hermen, any potential clients are very web savvy now, and most will validate you code to check you are a compitent coder.
    Jus' Lurkin'

  16. #16
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    2,813
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Torrent of Flame View Post
    How do you mean? I dont think I quite understand you.

    Hermen, any potential clients are very web savvy now, and most will validate you code to check you are a compitent coder.
    I'm pretty sure it's to make sure that it's cross-browser compatible, too.

    And I understand what you're doing with the RGB now. ^^ It makes a lot of sense, and it's pretty cool.. I think it should blend more or something.. maybe have the colors loaded but change the opacity onmouseover and onmouseout? I think that'd be pretty cool.. If you don't like that idea, you should blend them into black more, in my opinion. It's just.. too sudden for me. It could very possibly be due to the full white screen below it (I know you're not done, love. Just trying to help. ), or if they're just too.. bold, I suppose. :] Either way, good luck! (I really like the opacity idea.. in my mind it looks really cool.. OH! And the text is a little bit too in between pixelated and smooth.. I tried it in Opera, Chrome, FireFox, and IE, so I don't think it's due to my browser.. Just make them as images? (Just the text or the button + text.. either way.. ))

  17. #17
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    South East England
    Posts
    2,906
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Quoted
    8 Post(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ian. View Post
    I'm pretty sure it's to make sure that it's cross-browser compatible, too.

    And I understand what you're doing with the RGB now. ^^ It makes a lot of sense, and it's pretty cool.. I think it should blend more or something.. maybe have the colors loaded but change the opacity onmouseover and onmouseout? I think that'd be pretty cool.. If you don't like that idea, you should blend them into black more, in my opinion. It's just.. too sudden for me. It could very possibly be due to the full white screen below it (I know you're not done, love. Just trying to help. ), or if they're just too.. bold, I suppose. :] Either way, good luck! (I really like the opacity idea.. in my mind it looks really cool.. OH! And the text is a little bit too in between pixelated and smooth.. I tried it in Opera, Chrome, FireFox, and IE, so I don't think it's due to my browser.. Just make them as images? (Just the text or the button + text.. either way.. ))
    OMFG IAN I LOVE YOU. <3

    And also, thanks for the feedback. CSS3 is all that has opacity and it isnt very used at the moment, also, images take too long to load (not much but enough to ruin potential clients interest, etc.)
    Jus' Lurkin'

  18. #18
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    2,254
    Mentioned
    21 Post(s)
    Quoted
    238 Post(s)

    Default

    I think it looks cool.

  19. #19
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    The Netherlands
    Posts
    5,553
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Default

    CSS gives access to opacity? Awesome!
    ~Hermen

  20. #20
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    209
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Default

    Hermen, yes it does, though like ToF said "it isn't very used atm" as browser support for it just.. fails.

    There are plenty of browser specific css styles (-moz-radius etc), however these aren't valid

    Nice site so far, ToF <£ <3

  21. #21
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    2,813
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Default

    I tested it in IE and FF and it worked (opacity).

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •