Why is Lockerz allowed in signatures, but Bux.to isn't?

[Harry]

Cool. So remove it from your siggies please guys ^^

[Bobarkinator]

Public announcement?

[Wizzup?]

Public announcement?

I see no reason to. It wasn't allowed, and it still isn't. People having it in their signatures will receive an infraction or worse.

[_ChArMz]

First, God damn, harry is a whiny little bitch.

Second, I don't think this retard knows what a pyramid scheme is. he needs to google it.

third, i think i provided him with more than enough proof that it is legit.

If its against the rules, remove it from your sigs, so harry can stop crying please.

[YoHoJo]

I see no reason to. It wasn't allowed, and it still isn't. People having it in their signatures will receive an infraction or worse.

Unfair. I said I believed it was ok, so people may keep it based on that. Although its true the rules haven't changed I may have caused a misunderstanding. Warning ONLY, or announcement please.

@Charmz
1) Be nice please.
2) No matter what it is, it IS 'click for cash' type of website, which is, and always has been, against the SRL rules. Sorry :/.

[Bobarkinator]

First, God damn, harry is a whiny little bitch.

Second, I don't think this retard knows what a pyramid scheme is. he needs to google it.

third, i think i provided him with more than enough proof that it is legit.

If its agaisnt the rules, remove it from your sigs, so harry can stop crying please.

No it's not a pyramid scheme. But BEING LEGIT DOESN'T MATTER IN THIS CASE! That's not what we are arguing about.

[Dynamite]

People having it in their signatures will receive an infraction or worse.

You know what...
Stuff it, ban me please YoHoJo.
I cannot take any more of this childishness from you Wizzup.
As YoHoJo said, he told people it was fine.
And now you threaten to "ban" people?
If the statement ^ is true.
Please ban me.

[Harry]

First, God damn, harry is a whiny little bitch.

Second, I don't think this retard knows what a pyramid scheme is. he needs to google it.

third, i think i provided him with more than enough proof that it is legit.

If its against the rules, remove it from your sigs, so harry can stop crying please.

tl;dr:

[Wizzup?]

You know what...
Stuff it, ban me please YoHoJo.
I cannot take any more of this childishness from you Wizzup.
As YoHoJo said, he told people it was fine.
And now you threaten to "ban" people?
If the statement ^ is true.
Please ban me.

Childishness? You act like a retard, you disobey the rules, and you are the one having an "illegal" signature.

I find it ridiculous how you turn an Infraction into a Ban.

[Dynamite]

Childishness? You act like a retard, you disobey the rules, and you are the one having an "illegal" signature.

I find it ridiculous how you turn in Infraction into a Ban.

So obeying your "handpicked" mods is me acting like a retard?
I find it ridiculous how you can't read your own writing...

People having it in their signatures will receive an infraction or worse.

Hmm, I wonder what the "or worse" bit was...

[Wizzup?]

So obeying your "handpicked" mods is me acting like a retard?
I find it ridiculous how you can't read your own writing...

Hmm, I wonder what the "or worse" bit was...

How do you "Obey" YoHoJo? Did he force you to put that in your signature?
If that is the case, I will remove the Infraction.

Why don't you go and read the rules for once? You obviously take them too lightly; your "cups" tell me enough.

[YoHoJo]

Mods are picked by Staff, democratically.
Dont bring me too into this, I said they were allowed, I was wrong, sorry, read the rules.
Wizzup isnt being childish, he infracted you for not following the rules and having an illegal signature. Big deal?

You broke rule (accidentally).
You get infraction.
End of story, I dont see why your that upset?

[Dynamite]

How do you "Obey" YoHoJo? Did he force you to put that in your signature?
If that is the case, I will remove the Infraction.

Why don't you go and read the rules for once? You obviously take them too lightly; your "cups" tell me enough.

OK, obey is the wrong word.
But he told us it was fine to have them.
Read the rules?
Nah CBA.
Oh you mean the Donator one?
Yeh I know I really should have thought about that more "/
Oh well.
Or the Old Timer one?
Yeh I really shouldn't have stayed here this long "/
But if you mean the BM one, then that aint a cup "/ sorry.

[Wizzup?]

OK, obey is the wrong word.
But he told us it was fine to have them.
Read the rules?
Nah CBA.
Oh you mean the Donator one?
Yeh I know I really should have thought about that more "/
Oh well.
Or the Old Timer one?
Yeh I really shouldn't have stayed here this long "/
But if you mean the BM one, then that aint a cup "/ sorry.

Right. That's it. See you in a month.

[Dynamite]

bye
wait can you make it a month and a half?

[YoHoJo]

Broke Rule. Infraction. Expires. All Better.
Stop the back-and-froths NAO! Grow up guise.

[code841]

This is what happens when you play the 'referral for personal gain' game.

[Bobarkinator]

I do think that The Man should have read the rules, yes. But more so, I believe that the higher staff should stand behind the decisions that the other staff make. I think that the signatures should be temporarily pardoned until everybody knows for sure. Anyways, I guess will make the best decision.

[Sex]

Mm, you always have to escalate a rather minor manner and it rewarded you with a ban..
I would have just removed the picture from my signature, accepted the infraction, and got on with my life.
The Man, what you said about reading the rules was pretty ignorant.
You should always read the rules when you join a community or anything of the sorts.
That way, you don't get into predicaments like this.
Wizzup, you really should have talked to YoHoJo, because he is a part of your staff after all, and you are responsible for your staff.

[YoHoJo]

He didnt get banned for the sig alone. He got banned for being extremely belligerent with staff. If he just stopped arguing Wizzup was even going to remove the infraction and leave him with a ban.

H
If that is the case, I will remove the Infraction.

The ban is all his own fault sorry to say.

No more talk about that, get back ON TOPIC. Which really doesn't matter anymore since the question is solved.

Are lockerz posts/sig links allowed?:NO!

Wizzup, you really should have talked to YoHoJo, because he is a part of your staff after all, and you are responsible for your staff.

Hes not my mom. Not is he anyone on the staff's mom. No is his a mom.
The Man/I should have really read the rules. This has nothing to do with Wizzup.
I incorrectly informed him, sorry about that.
But HE's the one who argued with Staff and wouldn't stop, which resulted in his ban.

[Brain]

Is lockerz a ""Click Cash"" website? (double quotes as the quote has quotes in it)
Just curious, as that is what is says directly in the rules...
What is defined as a "Click Cash" website?

[YoHoJo]

You go, answer a question (usually not survey-like) like, what your fav movie/music, what is you dream car, what are you doing for Halloween ect ect. And you get 2 points. Enough points get you stuff. But im90% sure eventually after site is popular enough itll turn into some homo ad-fest thing .

[Brain]

Well that is different than bux.to, when you look at ads for 30 seconds or something?

I think the rule in the official rule post should be amended to "referral for profit" websites, instead of "click cash" websites.

[YoHoJo]

Yeah its just assumed sites such as lockerz ect are not allowed, it should be worded better. Thanks.

[Narcle]

I believe that the higher staff should stand behind the decisions that the other staff make. I think that the signatures should be temporarily pardoned until everybody knows for sure.

I concur... to bad its too late.

@ Harry /golfclap
Next time you want to bring a issue up I suggest a more private forum or maybe a PM? This thread screams "whining" all over it to me, although it was a good question.