Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 26 to 33 of 33

Thread: OffSetMouse;

  1. #26
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Hungary (GMT + 1)
    Posts
    1,774
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Default

    Just for the record I like the idea itself of moving the mouse away a human-like way.
    But that should be something more like Tha Man said. Moving the mouse a little while the button is still down(mouse button). Not much, just as humans do.

    @Blumblebee: Good to hear somebody thinks I am correct. Doesn't happen much .

  2. #27
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    5,227
    Mentioned
    6 Post(s)
    Quoted
    60 Post(s)

    Default

    The argument that it's too simple isn't really valid, in my opinion. :/ Sorry, but tons of functions in SRL are just simple one line things..

    SCAR Code:
    procedure TypeSend(Text: string);
    begin
      TypeSendEx(Text, True);
    end;

    And many are just Result := something;. I don't think this should be commited because it doesn't make much sense to me, but the fact that it's too simple isn't really an argument.

  3. #28
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Alberta,Canada
    Posts
    2,358
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Sabzi View Post
    @Blumblebee: Good to hear somebody thinks I am correct. Doesn't happen much .


    Quote Originally Posted by i luffs yeww View Post
    The argument that it's too simple isn't really valid, in my opinion. :/ Sorry, but tons of functions in SRL are just simple one line things..

    SCAR Code:
    procedure TypeSend(Text: string);
    begin
      TypeSendEx(Text, True);
    end;

    And many are just Result := something;. I don't think this should be commited because it doesn't make much sense to me, but the fact that it's too simple isn't really an argument.
    you do realize typesend is there because it's simply taking the parameters out of typesend to make it more user-friendly, please take a look at TypeSendEx and tell me it's too simple.
    “Ignorance, the root and the stem of every evil.”

  4. #29
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    5,227
    Mentioned
    6 Post(s)
    Quoted
    60 Post(s)

    Default

    I know. I'm just saying that this is similar to the Result := Whatever; functions.

  5. #30
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Alberta,Canada
    Posts
    2,358
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by i luffs yeww View Post
    I know. I'm just saying that this is similar to the Result := Whatever; functions.
    not really. It's modifying an already working function to add a random parameter, not take parameters away.

    besides: typesend = useful, this = useless and can be added by a scripter without the increase of any lines really :/
    “Ignorance, the root and the stem of every evil.”

  6. #31
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    5,227
    Mentioned
    6 Post(s)
    Quoted
    60 Post(s)

    Default

    Blargh. Haha okay. I don't agree with this being different than single line functions. Here's an example..

    SCAR Code:
    {*******************************************************************************
    Function DidRedClick: boolean;
    By: Rasta Magician
    Description: Checks for the Red X after a Click, Times out after 500 ms
    *******************************************************************************}

    Function DidRedClick: Boolean;
    begin
      Result := DidClick(true, 1000);
    end;

    {*******************************************************************************
    Function DidYellowClick: Boolean;
    By: Rasta Magician
    Description: Checks for the Yellow X after a Click, Times out after 500 ms
    *******************************************************************************}

    Function DidYellowClick: Boolean;
    begin
      Result := DidClick(false, 1000);
    end;

    I just see no reason at all for those. And I see no reason for this because I don't feel it useful in the slightest. Except to show off your "ub3r 1337 scr33ptin skillzzzzZzzZZzzxz" to your friends. :/

  7. #32
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Alberta,Canada
    Posts
    2,358
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by i luffs yeww View Post
    Blargh. Haha okay. I don't agree with this being different than single line functions. Here's an example..

    SCAR Code:
    {*******************************************************************************
    Function DidRedClick: boolean;
    By: Rasta Magician
    Description: Checks for the Red X after a Click, Times out after 500 ms
    *******************************************************************************}

    Function DidRedClick: Boolean;
    begin
      Result := DidClick(true, 1000);
    end;

    {*******************************************************************************
    Function DidYellowClick: Boolean;
    By: Rasta Magician
    Description: Checks for the Yellow X after a Click, Times out after 500 ms
    *******************************************************************************}

    Function DidYellowClick: Boolean;
    begin
      Result := DidClick(false, 1000);
    end;

    I just see no reason at all for those. And I see no reason for this because I don't feel it useful in the slightest. Except to show off your "ub3r 1337 scr33ptin skillzzzzZzzZZzzxz" to your friends. :/
    those provide understanding, this does not. Your mixing up your concepts still The title is simply so that people don't have to go to the include continually to know if red is true or false etc. This is adding a *2 and -randomness to mmouse... (I love being difficult)
    “Ignorance, the root and the stem of every evil.”

  8. #33
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    5,227
    Mentioned
    6 Post(s)
    Quoted
    60 Post(s)

    Default

    x] Yeah, this is fun. <3

    And I agree with you, this is pointless. But the reason I think it's pointless isn't because it's "too simple." Because this is just Anti-ban. Everyone who uses anti-ban just uses straight functions/procedures from SRL. If this were like.. a one line way to find any TPA and nobody would ever have to do anything, then it'd make things too simple. Ya know?

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •