
Originally Posted by
anow2
Thank you,
there are small amounts of biased remarks, but none are to any COMMUNITY
You cannot POSSIBLY say that ARGA is as good as Aryan, or,
SCAR is as good as iScar, when it comes out.
There are obvious FACTS, not Opinions, an opinion is something you cant prove, we can prove iScar will be faster, than SCAR now, and that SCAR is minimizable, while the pro version of neXus IS.
1) ARGA > Aryan. Reason: ARGA == Private, It is much less detectable because Aryan used Deobs which if connected at the wrong point, or if JaGeX makes a large change in the Code, will fuck them hard. The only reason you think Aryan is good, is that it was public, which is complete bullshit. When you take a look at how much macrosoft could have made off ARGA, it is amazing. Instead they took the Free way, in which it inspired a great community to come together and learn some programming.
2) Maybe iScar will be faster, but it doesnt really matter, the only reason people use iBot is there tired of scar, why would they use iScar... -.-... Agree to disagree 
3) Who wants to pay for NeXuS?
4) Please remove the following statements from the IBOT overview:
Code:
Less detectable than a client forcing bot and SCAR/SRL.
Reason: You have no idea what you are talking about when you talk about ARGAs detectability, it in fact, depends on the quality of script. Also, you said its less detectable then SCAR/SRL.... It is once again up to the quality of the script. This is completley rediculous, because if you make a shitty script in IBOT in which doesnt have good features, and compare it to a scar script doesnt have good features, they will both be the same in quality. As for ARGA, well it will just be 10X more accurate, better random solving and will be completley undetectable if implemented with a logout/login system similar to SRL's.
Code:
better than SCAR/SRL
Reason: Perhaps speedwise, I am sure it is better. But SRL has more features.(and mouse functions).
Code:
Not as efficient as a client edit in theory.
Reason: How the hell do you think IBOT is anywhere close to being as efficient as a ARGA "in theory"?
Also, please removed the Java Modifiers tutorial as it has nothing to do with this wiki(Perhaps if the wiki was about learning java...) If anything add it into the IBot tutorial or scripting section. Add in a Scar scripting section.
Please remove this from the "Cheating Overview" section:
Code:
With all of the disadvantages and defects outlined above, one can clearly see that SCAR is only good for a starter and can be discarded as an option after a few days of cheating experience.
Clearley SRL has many more quality scripts, and even if you compare the amount of time SRL has been around, Ibot doesnt have nearly as many scripts(quality and quantity). Also, this is a bias comment.
That should clear up most of it, but I will post again if I see any more Bias/Untrue info.
PS: What would you think if I created a java plugin for scar in which it enabled the mouse events of mopars bot Cherokee, enabling scar users to use computer while using scar?( *Thinks about this idea
*) I am sure there are plenty of other things that Mopar wouldnt mind me checking into using a java plugin(Borrow some of Ibots features maybe considering that Ruler borrowed some of SRL's?) 2morecents