Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread: Problem with plugin.

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    3,044
    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)
    Quoted
    21 Post(s)

    Default Problem with plugin.

    Hello i get this error when using this plugin there is source too. Any ideas why.

    Code:
    access violation at address 00000000. Read of address 00000000
    Plugin DLL and source: https://svn.freddy1990.com/scar_shellutils/

    I have API Calls enabled.


    Thanks!

    ~Home

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    6,089
    Mentioned
    77 Post(s)
    Quoted
    43 Post(s)

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    5,227
    Mentioned
    6 Post(s)
    Quoted
    60 Post(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by nielsie95 View Post
    Apparently Freddy made that for Home.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    The Future.
    Posts
    5,600
    Mentioned
    396 Post(s)
    Quoted
    1598 Post(s)

    Default

    Hmm... nice try Freddy but thats a pretty badly coded scar plugin (Good attempt for the functions, which I must say is nice to have)..
    That said, every programmer knows that when you get such an error, he is basically calling a pointer to something when its declared NULL..

    Or he is calling a pointer to something when it doesnt even exist yet..

    Or he just has a ridiculous stack overflow and decides to ignore it and compile the plugin anyway..

    Check the code and see.. For some odd reason I cannot access any of the links above to check it =( Except for the thread which points me back to the same links above.. so yeah. Anyway as far as I know scar also has this problem on x64 machines..
    I am Ggzz..
    Hackintosher

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    5,227
    Mentioned
    6 Post(s)
    Quoted
    60 Post(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ggzz View Post
    Hmm... nice try Freddy but thats a pretty badly coded scar plugin (Good attempt for the functions, which I must say is nice to have)..
    That said, every programmer knows that when you get such an error, he is basically calling a pointer to something when its declared NULL..

    Or he is calling a pointer to something when it doesnt even exist yet..

    Or he just has a ridiculous stack overflow and decides to ignore it and compile the plugin anyway..

    Check the code and see.. For some odd reason I cannot access any of the links above to check it =( Except for the thread which points me back to the same links above.. so yeah. Anyway as far as I know scar also has this problem on x64 machines..
    Wait, what?

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    The Future.
    Posts
    5,600
    Mentioned
    396 Post(s)
    Quoted
    1598 Post(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by i luffs yeww View Post
    Wait, what?
    Read address 00000000 error is due to calling a pointer to an address when the pointer doesnt exist..

    its like this:

    Code:
    int x;
    int y;
    
    int main()
    {
      x == *p;  //de-reference
      y == &p   //pointer p
      return 0;
    }
    U see that?? p isnt declared anywhere but yet Im trying to use the information it points to aka nothing!.. even if I do declare pointer p and I declare it as a NULL pointer and then FREE IT, and I decide to call it, I will get that error.. Basically there is no way for Home to use that plugin unless he fixes it himself or freddy fixes it.
    IIRC, Jagex had this bullshit last week with the dungeoneering skill where they were calling pointers that didnt exist and when you went to the adventure log, it showed: "I have just leveled to 80 dungeoneering", "I have killed null null null null"..
    That was the reason for the system update which fixed that.

    check it out:

    http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2...dress-00000000
    Last edited by Brandon; 04-15-2011 at 09:42 PM.
    I am Ggzz..
    Hackintosher

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    5,227
    Mentioned
    6 Post(s)
    Quoted
    60 Post(s)

    Default

    Lol oops. Thought I was in a different thread and you said that..

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •