Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 27

Thread: This problem is bugging me...

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    1,349
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Default This problem is bugging me...

    sqrt(t-42)-sqrt(t+44)=83

    I know the problem looks like this.

    sqrt(t-42)=83+sqrt(t+44)

    and then you square both sides

    but im having a problem doing that :X

    I know the formula is this (a-b)^2=a^2-2ab+b^2

    and then i write it in ax^2 +bx +c = 0

    If someone can just help me out with squareing both sides that would be great. im not sure my numbers are right as they are rather big.

    Plz help, already tried google and looked through the book, just not the examples im looking for...

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Marquette, MI
    Posts
    15,252
    Mentioned
    138 Post(s)
    Quoted
    680 Post(s)

    Default

    Square each term. So you end up with (t - 42)^2 - (t + 44)^2 = 83^2. I think that's right. Either that or I just completely fail.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    The Future.
    Posts
    5,600
    Mentioned
    396 Post(s)
    Quoted
    1598 Post(s)

    Default

    ^ Thats right.. but u can also change the square root to a fraction like (t-42) ^ (1/2) then u square that.. and u get the cancellation
    I am Ggzz..
    Hackintosher

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Marquette, MI
    Posts
    15,252
    Mentioned
    138 Post(s)
    Quoted
    680 Post(s)

    Default

    Oh wait, no I wasn't right, you end up with (t - 42) - (t + 44) = 83^2 cause the sqrt and ^2 cancel out. My bad.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    1,349
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Default

    this is the problem:



    Edit: @cohen

    Yea that wouldnt work.

    I was tought to move one of the square roots over. and then square the left and the right.

    Thats where im stuck at.
    Last edited by Overtime; 07-24-2011 at 09:36 PM.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Marquette, MI
    Posts
    15,252
    Mentioned
    138 Post(s)
    Quoted
    680 Post(s)

    Default

    Yeah the way I work it out the t's cancel each other out, so it doesn't make sense.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    1,349
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Default

    Okay, i think i almost got it.

    I ended up with this:

    t-42=6889+166sqrt(t+44)+t+44

    then.

    6889+166sqrt(t+44)+86

    Can anyone confirm that I'm at least on the right trail?
    Last edited by Overtime; 07-24-2011 at 09:48 PM.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Het ademt zwaar en moedeloos vannacht.
    Posts
    7,211
    Mentioned
    26 Post(s)
    Quoted
    72 Post(s)

    Default

    Lolfailalgebra.
    sqrt(t-42)-sqrt(t+44)=83
    (sqrt(t-42)-sqrt(t+44))^2 = 83^2
    (sqrt(t-42)-sqrt(t+44))(sqrt(t-42)-sqrt(t+44)) = 6889
    sqrt^2(t-42)-2*sqrt(t-42)*sqrt(t+44)+sqrt^2(t+44)) = 6889
    t-42+t+44 -2*sqrt(t-42)sqrt(t+44) = 6889
    +2-2*sqrt(t-42)sqrt(t+44)=6889
    -2*sqrt(t-42)sqrt(t+44) =6887
    2*sqrt(t-42)*sqrt(t+44)=-6887
    So I just made a mistake and it all fails. 2* square roots cant be negative bro.

    Edit: Wait I can just prove this.
    sqrt(t-42)-sqrt(t+44) < 0
    Because, sqrt(t-42) < sqrt(t+44)
    t-42 < t+44

    No solution possible, because left side is negative and thus will never ever equal 83 without imaginary numbers.
    I made a new script, check it out!.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Netherlands
    Posts
    3,285
    Mentioned
    105 Post(s)
    Quoted
    494 Post(s)

    Default

    This one got no answer. It is impossible.

    you can prove: sqrt(t-42) < sqrt(t+44)

    So the answer would be negative. 83 is not possible.
    Working on: Tithe Farmer

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Het ademt zwaar en moedeloos vannacht.
    Posts
    7,211
    Mentioned
    26 Post(s)
    Quoted
    72 Post(s)

    Default

    ^ ninja'd
    I made a new script, check it out!.

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Netherlands
    Posts
    3,285
    Mentioned
    105 Post(s)
    Quoted
    494 Post(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Markus View Post
    ^ ninja'd
    I hate you! Didn't had maths in 2 years. Had to search for all algebra rules again in the dusty old rooms of my brain. First I was on the same track as coh3n, then had an eureka moment, knowing the answer. Checked if no one else posted it yet, typed it, pressed enter. Felt like 'the' man. And then I see your comment...
    Working on: Tithe Farmer

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    1,349
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Default

    Its solveable with imaginary numbers....

    Just need help with completing the square...



  13. #13
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Here :p
    Posts
    194
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Default

    ummm... ur all looking at this wrong
    remember there is a + and - answer to all square roots
    so
    move the root t + 44 across and square gives

    tidy this up gives


    no matter what this gives the answer t = 1765.5

    now put this in and you will find it works if the second sqrt is negative only. so there is a solution


    isnt there a maths teacher on these forums..

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Netherlands
    Posts
    3,285
    Mentioned
    105 Post(s)
    Quoted
    494 Post(s)

    Default

    But as Overtime posted it there was no +/- sign, so wouldn't that be a principal square root?
    Working on: Tithe Farmer

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    1,349
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Default

    That answer is incorrect even if i tried rounding it off.

    Tomorrow Im meeting my math tutor before class.

    He is suprised that this was one of my homework questions. and i will let you guys know the answer.

    But if ya'll know it before he does, post it!

  16. #16
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    West Philadelphia, born and raised
    Posts
    522
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Quoted
    19 Post(s)

    Default

    Well, the TI-89 seems to think this is an impossible problem. No real solutions, no nonreal/i-term solutions.

    The farthest I can get it by hand is:

    sqrt(t - 42) - sqrt(t + 44) = 83
    sqrt(t - 42) = 83 + sqrt(t + 44)
    t - 42 = 166*sqrt(t + 44) + t + 6933
    -6975/166 = sqrt(t + 44)

    Unless I'm being terribad at math, this suggests that t=i*47438161/27556
    In decimals, t=1721.518*i
    However, when plugged into the original equation this is untrue (you get -1.036 = 83)
    Long ago, the '90s Nicktoons lived together in harmony. Then, everything changed when the century turned. Only Avatar, the best of the 2000's Nicktoons, could save them. But when the channel needed it most, the show finished. Four years passed and Mike and Bryan created the new Avatar: Legend of Korra. And although the show itself is great, it has a long way to go before it can live up to The Last Airbender. But I believe Korra can save Nickelodeon.

  17. #17
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    1,349
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Default

    Woot Tlachtli is right.

    Can you explain some of your math plZ?!?!?!

    Its only 1721.5

    no i

    Last edited by Overtime; 07-25-2011 at 04:35 AM.

  18. #18
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    1,447
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Quoted
    1 Post(s)

    Default

    This is how you solve this equation:
    • Isolate one root
    • Square both sides
    • Simplify
    • Isolate the remaining root
    • Square both sides
    • Move the constants to one side


    The answer I got down to the last decimal is: 1721.517707 = t.

  19. #19
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    West Philadelphia, born and raised
    Posts
    522
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Quoted
    19 Post(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Overtime View Post
    Its only 1721.5

    no i
    Square both sides again, negative goes away. No i. I should have thought about that earlier.

    Anyways, I think its interesting that the calculator can't come up with a solution for this one.
    Long ago, the '90s Nicktoons lived together in harmony. Then, everything changed when the century turned. Only Avatar, the best of the 2000's Nicktoons, could save them. But when the channel needed it most, the show finished. Four years passed and Mike and Bryan created the new Avatar: Legend of Korra. And although the show itself is great, it has a long way to go before it can live up to The Last Airbender. But I believe Korra can save Nickelodeon.

  20. #20
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Marquette, MI
    Posts
    15,252
    Mentioned
    138 Post(s)
    Quoted
    680 Post(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Tlachtli View Post
    Anyways, I think its interesting that the calculator can't come up with a solution for this one.
    Because there is no real solution. Would just like point out that I said that, just in a different way. After you square each term + collect like terms, there aren't any t's left. >.<

  21. #21
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Netherlands
    Posts
    3,285
    Mentioned
    105 Post(s)
    Quoted
    494 Post(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Coh3n View Post
    Because there is no real solution. Would just like point out that I said that, just in a different way. After you square each term + collect like terms, there aren't any t's left. >.<
    As mentioned before, there is a solution. I just don't agree with the notation, that is the symbol of a principal square root and not a square root...
    Working on: Tithe Farmer

  22. #22
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Marquette, MI
    Posts
    15,252
    Mentioned
    138 Post(s)
    Quoted
    680 Post(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by masterBB View Post
    As mentioned before, there is a solution. I just don't agree with the notation, that is the symbol of a principal square root and not a square root...
    I said there's no real solution... you and Markus said the same thing. What an I missing?

  23. #23
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Netherlands
    Posts
    3,285
    Mentioned
    105 Post(s)
    Quoted
    494 Post(s)

    Default

    That it's not a principal square, it also returns negative. It has an answer.

    And your maths are off anyway, if you use your math rules, this would have worked:

    sqrt(9) + sqrt(4) = 5 -> 3 + 2 = 5
    9 + 4 = 5^2 -> 13 doesn't equal 25, this ain't right.
    Working on: Tithe Farmer

  24. #24
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Marquette, MI
    Posts
    15,252
    Mentioned
    138 Post(s)
    Quoted
    680 Post(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by masterBB View Post
    That it's not a principal square, it also returns negative. It has an answer.

    And your maths are off anyway, if you use your math rules, this would have worked:

    sqrt(9) + sqrt(4) = 5 -> 3 + 2 = 5
    9 + 4 = 5^2 -> 13 doesn't equal 25, this ain't right.
    Heh good point. I should really brush up on my math...

  25. #25
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    1,472
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Quoted
    8 Post(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by masterBB View Post
    That it's not a principal square, it also returns negative. It has an answer.

    And your maths are off anyway, if you use your math rules, this would have worked:

    sqrt(9) + sqrt(4) = 5 -> 3 + 2 = 5
    9 + 4 = 5^2 -> 13 doesn't equal 25, this ain't right.
    mind telling me how u go from line 1 to line 2?

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •