This update truly deserves a spot in the little black book

Also this:![]()
Im updating my Draynor fisher. Should be finished this weekend.
SRL's F.A.Q. (Error fixes) | How to Convert SRL-5 Scripts to SRL-6 | Draynor Chop N' Bank (RS3)| AIO Superheater (RS3)
T - E - A - MTogether Everyone Achieves More
If I recall, RSBuddy's progress resulted in the mere loading of the client and obtaining a ban instantaneously on login.
Progress and more progress! That's good news![]()
I massively agree with you about the reference to all current bots being massively based off, and or influenced heavily by Aryan - As for a speedy recovery, it's not looking promising at the moment. Jagex have done themself a nice little treat at the moment: Switching around usage of native code, mashing everything into one huuuge array and removing (as we know / define it) the loader.
What has been learned recently (and when I say recently, I mean over the last year or two) has to be completely thrown to a side and only used for assisting in what must be redone now as far as I'm concerned.
great thread. i got a comment and a suggestion:
comment: i have never used unsigned clients when botting. i have always botted signed. why? cuz it loads faster, and remembers cache. (ok maybe 1/1000 times il load unsigned)
and ive never been banned. and i bot hard. its not on an army. mostly on 1 acc for like 8-18 hrs a day. minimal breaks if any.
i rather doubt jagex will use java to monitor the systems of its customers. some heavy privacy law issues. even if they were to, i dont think they can do it unless it says so in their TOS or they will have to update their TOS and have us accept. (someone confirm this as i think im right but not 100% sure).
apart from that...my suggestion:
can you add to this threads OP the changes that jagex made to the game client. i belive ive seen marpis' post on the changes but i was unsure if he was speculating or quoting, so could you make like 2 lists saying confirmed (with source) and speculation (by whom - as in trusted such as wizz or marpis).
thanks.
oh also, as far as color scripts go, werent all randoms based on ref? as in when we had ref did we even bother updating random fixes for colors?
Unfortunately in Jagex's ToS, they state they withhold the right to update/alter/modify the ToS at any time without notification (They have done this in the past).
So they've changed the wording a little bit, but they are basically saying if you're not a member by loading our applet you accept our ToS. If you are a member, the fact that you are a member means you accept the ToS.Originally Posted by RS ToS
Edit:
So again, they can change it at any time without notifying us.Originally Posted by RS Privacy Policy
Note that the scope of information they are collecting that could fall under "[...]details of your device's [...] software specifications." it isn't defined.Originally Posted by RS Privacy Policy
Last edited by Hobbit; 11-01-2011 at 06:58 AM.
STOP PM'ING ME
well thats not good. but im wondering if this kinda falls into a scenario where its like your having a contract to do illegal things...err what i mean is ...:
is it ok for jagex to simply say by visiting our website u agree we can invade ur privacy?
i mean isnt that like holding a gun t someones head and forcing them to sign a contract? err ofc one can argue that no ones forcing us to play rs, but what im saying is shouldn't they be restricted?? i suppose its country to country basis on laws. or would we have to abide by the laws of the countries in which the servers reside?
Scanning your computer and harvesting information which they then store would indeed be against privacy laws. Scanning your computer (per terms of a ToS/Priv Policy) for adjacent processes flagged at "bots" but storing no personal information would be well within law.
I believe WoW does this?
STOP PM'ING ME
Current projects:
[ AeroGuardians (GotR minigame), Motherlode Miner, Blast furnace ]
"I won't fall in your gravity. Open your eyes,
you're the Earth and I'm the sky..."
wouldn't it be a simple matter to alter the name or signature of such software? similar to the concept that rs updates hooks could we not have our bots change process name? split processes?(idk if that's even possible) or have a firewall limit the data java can receive/send? protocols and ports etc
Never ever approach a computer saying or even thinking "I will just do this quickly".
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)