Well let me begin to say that I know that I'm going to be flamed by the large majority of this site. Let me also include that I don't care, and that I'm impervious to mass pressure and am also totally flame-proof.
My complaint is this;
Mods on this site are either:
a. Prejudiced users who use their mod-ship privileges to exact revenge
b. Mindless automatons who automatically infract without due process
c. All of the above
I personally circled "c."
Let me start with Evidence (infraction) #1.
I was infracted for: "Insulted Other Member(s)" by BraKI agree totally agree that the majority of you probably evolved from apes. Me on the other hand, 100% human being (with no ape).
Now let me explain the circumstances. We were arguing religion, and many of the victimized atheists were using the theory of evolution as proof against Biblical creationism. Of course, many of them brought up the theory that humans evolved from primates. I merely agreed with them.
Please explain IN DETAIL what was insulting about this message.
To me it seems as if you get infracted for being a Christian on this site, and promoted for being atheist (hint to all you achievers).
Evidence (infraction) #2
*Note, I am censoring this message so that delicate ears will not be offended.
Inappropriate Language BraK
Really. I got infracted for quoting someone else's infraction. This site borders on Communism. You know, everyone in their perfect little utopia sharing everything -, but when you go against authority you get lined up for the firing squad. And all the little Simba's jump in like a bunch of sharks on the blood scent, because if they agree with you, then they're automatically a public enemy.Originally Posted by BraK
Now for the infraction.
Apparently I got infracted because it was not clear that I was quoting someone. NOT CLEAR they said.
Please refer to the bolded parts in Evidence #2.
1. "Don't feel bad, I found this on pastebin."
E. Can this get much simpler?
2. Under the infraction I put "(Response)" in parenthesis. It's obviously not
my thoughts on the subject, after all, I don't even know the dude.
When I confronted (actually, he confronted me) Markus he said this:
Now. I would appreciate if all would focus on the message BraK sent me with the infraction (below).After some research, yes we found that quote of you on Pastebin.
I just have to say, I can't begin to tell you all the things wrong with your post. Over 4 grammatical errors in 3 sentences! Dude, are you serious? It looks like you reeled this thing off in 5 seconds. I doubt you even read the quote.I can't begin to tell you all the things wrong with your post. First Do Not Cussing there are better alternatives. Second Don't insult other Members.
I would also like to point something out about this "Inappropriate Language" or "Do Not Cussing" as you put it.
1. If this site has something about 'bad' language, then you should censor
it. It's the next step to your Communist dreamworld anyways.
2. You really outdid yourself here BraK. I found this literally without searching, just saw it in the top results and quoted you. In this one sentence you both broke your "Do Not Cussing"/Inappropriate Language AS WELL as insulting the dude asking the question. Does your hypocrisy know no bounds?
3.andOriginally Posted by Markus
Could have fooled me with the North-Korea stuff. I've been threatened with the ban-hammer for complaining about thisOriginally Posted by Markus
My third complaint also has to do with Evidence #2.
If you look at what the dude was infracted for, you will see he was given 2 points for saying.Have fun.
Is there something wrong here?
That is all I have time to write right now, but it should be significant enough evidence for a drastic overhaul of the legal procedures on this site.
*I must say that despite quoting Markus, he has been quite a bit more reasonable than BraK.