Is the ACA Color finding the same as simba? I have tried using it a few times in scripts but it hasn't been too reliable yet..
EDIT: It has worked better for me when I lower the color tolerance.
Is the ACA Color finding the same as simba? I have tried using it a few times in scripts but it hasn't been too reliable yet..
EDIT: It has worked better for me when I lower the color tolerance.
Last edited by Sawyer; 02-16-2013 at 01:10 AM.
Did u see yohojo's video on how to use it?
Found here: http://villavu.com/forum/showthread.php?t=71074
(It's MUCH more accurate)
Creds to DannyRS for this wonderful sig!
it's working a bit better, and yes, I have. I still have a lot to learn.
ACA is more for finding many pixels of the same color shade near each other, not just one pixel, but it should be the same as Simba, just has more options and is faster to use
Programming is like trying keep a wall of shifting sand up, you fix one thing but somewhere else starts crumbling
Well, so far it's working for my script. I'm lucky that particular tree is a very weird color![]()
Nah. It gets much more interesting when the thing you want to click on is the exact same colour as everything else on the screen. Until you come up with a few tricks, you might pull a few of your hair off, but it's quite rewarding once you get it working.
Good luck on your scripts everyone!
EDIT: As an effort to make my post somewhat worthwhile... The simba colour picker works with CTS 1 I believe (please correct me if I'm wrong) while you can use CTS 0 to 2 with ACA. CTS 2 is particularly useful for precise colour finding. I suggest you to read masterBB's CTS tutorial to get a better idea of how all of this works: http://villavu.com/forum/showthread.php?t=74908.
Programming is like trying keep a wall of shifting sand up, you fix one thing but somewhere else starts crumbling
You could use bitmaps, but DTM is faster and easier.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)